The present contribution aims at assessing Italy’s international obligations in respect to the acts of torture allegedly committed against Giulio Regeni, in Egypt by Egyptian authorities. Taking into account the Constitutional Court’s judgment in the case at stake, the paper tries to understand whether Italy was bound by an international obligation to investigate and prosecute those acts and which is the source of such an obligation. It appears that, differently from what the Constitutional Court had held, there is no such obligation binding the State of passive nationality – notably, of the nationality of the victim – under general international law and the Convention against Torture, pursuant to which the exercise of extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction on the basis of the principle of passive nationality is respectively legal and allowed. Such an obligation, however, may be imposed under the ECHR, pursuant to which a State which institute an investigation over deaths occurred abroad on the basis of the principle of passive nationality establishes a jurisdictional link capable of triggering the positive obligations of investigation and prosecution enshrined in Articles 2 and 3 of the ECHR. It therefore appears that the correct intermediate parameter of constitutionality in the case before the Constitutional Court should have been the ECHR, and not the Convention against Torture.

Acconciamessa, L. (2024). Esiste un obbligo internazionale dell’Italia di perseguire atti di tortura commessi all’estero ai danni di un proprio cittadino?. DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE, 18(1), 93-107 [10.12829/113343].

Esiste un obbligo internazionale dell’Italia di perseguire atti di tortura commessi all’estero ai danni di un proprio cittadino?

Acconciamessa, Lorenzo
2024-01-01

Abstract

The present contribution aims at assessing Italy’s international obligations in respect to the acts of torture allegedly committed against Giulio Regeni, in Egypt by Egyptian authorities. Taking into account the Constitutional Court’s judgment in the case at stake, the paper tries to understand whether Italy was bound by an international obligation to investigate and prosecute those acts and which is the source of such an obligation. It appears that, differently from what the Constitutional Court had held, there is no such obligation binding the State of passive nationality – notably, of the nationality of the victim – under general international law and the Convention against Torture, pursuant to which the exercise of extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction on the basis of the principle of passive nationality is respectively legal and allowed. Such an obligation, however, may be imposed under the ECHR, pursuant to which a State which institute an investigation over deaths occurred abroad on the basis of the principle of passive nationality establishes a jurisdictional link capable of triggering the positive obligations of investigation and prosecution enshrined in Articles 2 and 3 of the ECHR. It therefore appears that the correct intermediate parameter of constitutionality in the case before the Constitutional Court should have been the ECHR, and not the Convention against Torture.
2024
Settore GIUR-09/A - Diritto internazionale
Acconciamessa, L. (2024). Esiste un obbligo internazionale dell’Italia di perseguire atti di tortura commessi all’estero ai danni di un proprio cittadino?. DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE, 18(1), 93-107 [10.12829/113343].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
7. Acconciamessa_Regeni italiano.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 395.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
395.72 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/670962
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact