This chapter is divided into two parts. In the first part (paragraphs 1-8), I introduce the general problem of “naturalization”. I outline the context in which the discussion is situated - the tumultuous development of the cognitive sciences in the middle of the last century and the associated wave of diffusion of philosophical naturalism - and I draw, in broad strokes, the model of naturalization that seems to me to be the most robust. The discourse will initially be developed in general terms, since the problem of naturalization is far-reaching and affects the whole map of relations between philosophy on the one hand, and empirical sciences on the other hand - and in particular the empirical sciences of the mind, especially psychology and cognitive neurosciences. To conclude, I focus on the naturalization of normativity. In the second part (paragraphs 9-14), I wonder whether the program of naturalization, in the variant described, can be considered “reductionist,” and whether, if so, this is a bad or a good thing.
Brigaglia, M. (2024). Naturalizaciones y reducciones. En diálogo con Manuel Atienza. In J. Aguiló Regla, R. Buzón Ibáñez, P. Grández (a cura di), Atienza en la Palestra: reduccionismo jurídico. Palestra.
Naturalizaciones y reducciones. En diálogo con Manuel Atienza
Brigaglia, Marco
2024-09-15
Abstract
This chapter is divided into two parts. In the first part (paragraphs 1-8), I introduce the general problem of “naturalization”. I outline the context in which the discussion is situated - the tumultuous development of the cognitive sciences in the middle of the last century and the associated wave of diffusion of philosophical naturalism - and I draw, in broad strokes, the model of naturalization that seems to me to be the most robust. The discourse will initially be developed in general terms, since the problem of naturalization is far-reaching and affects the whole map of relations between philosophy on the one hand, and empirical sciences on the other hand - and in particular the empirical sciences of the mind, especially psychology and cognitive neurosciences. To conclude, I focus on the naturalization of normativity. In the second part (paragraphs 9-14), I wonder whether the program of naturalization, in the variant described, can be considered “reductionist,” and whether, if so, this is a bad or a good thing.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Naturalizaciones y reducciones. En diálogo con Manuel Atienza.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Descrizione: testo completo
Tipologia:
Pre-print
Dimensione
195.63 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
195.63 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.