Moving from the analysis of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Locascia and Others v. Italy case, this article formulates some critical reflections on some jurisprudential guidelines detectable in the previous case-law concerning pollution from hazardous activities in general and waste disposal in particular. Firstly, it is shown how the judgment contributes to consolidate the Court’s tendency to turn to ad hoc criteria, in this specific case a simple presumption, in order to ascertain the applicants’ victim status. Secondly, it is noted how, symmetrically to the ruling on admissibility, the Court resorts to a simplified standard of proof even on the merits. Thirdly, one finds how the judgment confirms the Court's uncertain attitude with regard the definition of the scope of application of Article 8 ECHR as opposed to that of Article 2 ECHR in the field of protection from pollution.
Ferrara, M. (2024). Ambiente e diritti umani nella sentenza Locascia della Corte europea dei diritti umani: tra espedienti tecnici e scelte di politica giudiziaria. DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE, 18(3), 671-692.
Ambiente e diritti umani nella sentenza Locascia della Corte europea dei diritti umani: tra espedienti tecnici e scelte di politica giudiziaria
Ferrara, Maria
2024-01-01
Abstract
Moving from the analysis of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Locascia and Others v. Italy case, this article formulates some critical reflections on some jurisprudential guidelines detectable in the previous case-law concerning pollution from hazardous activities in general and waste disposal in particular. Firstly, it is shown how the judgment contributes to consolidate the Court’s tendency to turn to ad hoc criteria, in this specific case a simple presumption, in order to ascertain the applicants’ victim status. Secondly, it is noted how, symmetrically to the ruling on admissibility, the Court resorts to a simplified standard of proof even on the merits. Thirdly, one finds how the judgment confirms the Court's uncertain attitude with regard the definition of the scope of application of Article 8 ECHR as opposed to that of Article 2 ECHR in the field of protection from pollution.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Maria Ferrara - Ambiente e diritti umani nella sentenza Locascia....pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
320.86 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
320.86 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.