Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate sexual communication as a mechanism involved in the link between emotion regulation and sexual functioning in a sample of adult women, also testing the moderating role of relationship status and age in this association. Method: 1344 sexually active cisgender women (aged 18–57, M = 27.34; SD= 6.484) were recruited from March 30, 2021, to April 12, 2021, through an online survey. From the initial sample, 1280 women were retained and included in the analysis. Participants were asked to respond to three self-report questionnaires: the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), the Communication subscale of the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS- W), and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Results: We found that sexual communication mediated the link between emotion regulation abilities and female sexual functioning. Moreover, we found that age, but not relationship status, moderated the association between emotion regulation and sexual communication, so that older women with difficulties in emotion regulation processes showed worse sexual communication abilities as compared to younger women. Conclusions: According to this study’s results, clinicians and sexual therapists should carefully consider emotion regulation abilities and sexual communication as crucial factors in promoting women’s sexual well-being.

Falgares G, Costanzo G, Fontanesi L, Verrocchio M C, Bin F, Marchetti D (2024). The role of sexual communication in the relationship between emotion regulation and sexual functioning in women: The impact of age and relationship status. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY [10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100482].

The role of sexual communication in the relationship between emotion regulation and sexual functioning in women: The impact of age and relationship status

Falgares G;Costanzo G;
2024-07-05

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate sexual communication as a mechanism involved in the link between emotion regulation and sexual functioning in a sample of adult women, also testing the moderating role of relationship status and age in this association. Method: 1344 sexually active cisgender women (aged 18–57, M = 27.34; SD= 6.484) were recruited from March 30, 2021, to April 12, 2021, through an online survey. From the initial sample, 1280 women were retained and included in the analysis. Participants were asked to respond to three self-report questionnaires: the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), the Communication subscale of the Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS- W), and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Results: We found that sexual communication mediated the link between emotion regulation abilities and female sexual functioning. Moreover, we found that age, but not relationship status, moderated the association between emotion regulation and sexual communication, so that older women with difficulties in emotion regulation processes showed worse sexual communication abilities as compared to younger women. Conclusions: According to this study’s results, clinicians and sexual therapists should carefully consider emotion regulation abilities and sexual communication as crucial factors in promoting women’s sexual well-being.
5-lug-2024
Falgares G, Costanzo G, Fontanesi L, Verrocchio M C, Bin F, Marchetti D (2024). The role of sexual communication in the relationship between emotion regulation and sexual functioning in women: The impact of age and relationship status. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY [10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100482].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Falgares et al. 2024.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Contributo completo
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 607.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
607.25 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/644953
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact