This paper investigates the relations between the concepts of moral harm and moral responsibility, arguing for a circularity between the two. On this basis the conceptual soundness of descriptivism, on which consequentialist and non-consequentialist arguments are often grounded, is questioned. In the last section a certain version of ascriptivism is defended: the circularity is relevant in order to understand how a restricted version of ascriptivism may in fact be well founded.
Denaro, P. (2012). Moral Harm and Moral Responsibility: A Defence of Ascriptivism. RATIO JURIS, 25(25), 149-179 [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00508.x].
Data di pubblicazione: | 2012 | |
Titolo: | Moral Harm and Moral Responsibility: A Defence of Ascriptivism | |
Autori: | ||
Citazione: | Denaro, P. (2012). Moral Harm and Moral Responsibility: A Defence of Ascriptivism. RATIO JURIS, 25(25), 149-179 [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00508.x]. | |
Rivista: | ||
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00508.x | |
URL: | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00508.x/abstract | |
Settore Scientifico Disciplinare: | Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Diritto | |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.01 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PIETRO-2012-Ratio_Juris.pdf | N/A | Administrator Richiedi una copia |