In Interpretivism and the Limits of Law, two perspectives on legal philosophy are brought into comparison, outlining two models: the communicative model and the interpretive model. This essay deals with three arguments levelled against legal interpretivism and proposes an attempt to defend this model of law.
A. Schiavello (2024). Three Arguments for Legal Interpretivism. NOTIZIE DI POLITEIA(153), 151-161.
Three Arguments for Legal Interpretivism
A. Schiavello
2024-01-01
Abstract
In Interpretivism and the Limits of Law, two perspectives on legal philosophy are brought into comparison, outlining two models: the communicative model and the interpretive model. This essay deals with three arguments levelled against legal interpretivism and proposes an attempt to defend this model of law.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Three arguments for legal interpretivism.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
750.89 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
750.89 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
