Fibre Reinforced Polymers (FRPs) are finding more applications in different industrial sectors. From a sustainability point of view, a component made of FRPs reduces energy consumption and CO2 emissions during its usephase due to the material’s lightweight nature. However, the production of these materials impacts the global energy demand significantly. To mitigate this impact, circular economy strategies are essential. This study focuses on a Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) analysis for different End-of-Life (EoL) strategies of FRPs components. Three EoL routes were evaluated: i.e., combustion, recycling and reforming of continuous fibres reinforced thermoplastics. Different fibres and matrices and three Fibre Volume Fractions (FVF) were taken into account. Specifically, Glass Fibres, Carbon Fibres, Polypropylene, and Polyether ether ketone were examined while FVF of 11%, 23% and 45% were evaluated. A Life Cycle Inventory data was built combining literature review and CES Edupack database. The results provided some guidelines for optimising the product’s EoL phase in terms of CED reduction underlining the advantages and high competitiveness of the reforming strategy especially if high-performance matrices and/or fibres are processed. Recycling results to be a valuable EoL alternative if FRPs made by high-performance fibres and high FVF are employed while combustion is the more advisable option if low-performance matrices and fibres are used.

Borda F., Ingarao G., Ambrogio G., Gagliardi F. (2024). Cumulative energy demand analysis in the current manufacturing and end-of-life strategies for a polymeric composite at different fibre-matrix combinations. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 449 [10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141775].

Cumulative energy demand analysis in the current manufacturing and end-of-life strategies for a polymeric composite at different fibre-matrix combinations

Ingarao G.;
2024-04-10

Abstract

Fibre Reinforced Polymers (FRPs) are finding more applications in different industrial sectors. From a sustainability point of view, a component made of FRPs reduces energy consumption and CO2 emissions during its usephase due to the material’s lightweight nature. However, the production of these materials impacts the global energy demand significantly. To mitigate this impact, circular economy strategies are essential. This study focuses on a Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) analysis for different End-of-Life (EoL) strategies of FRPs components. Three EoL routes were evaluated: i.e., combustion, recycling and reforming of continuous fibres reinforced thermoplastics. Different fibres and matrices and three Fibre Volume Fractions (FVF) were taken into account. Specifically, Glass Fibres, Carbon Fibres, Polypropylene, and Polyether ether ketone were examined while FVF of 11%, 23% and 45% were evaluated. A Life Cycle Inventory data was built combining literature review and CES Edupack database. The results provided some guidelines for optimising the product’s EoL phase in terms of CED reduction underlining the advantages and high competitiveness of the reforming strategy especially if high-performance matrices and/or fibres are processed. Recycling results to be a valuable EoL alternative if FRPs made by high-performance fibres and high FVF are employed while combustion is the more advisable option if low-performance matrices and fibres are used.
10-apr-2024
Borda F., Ingarao G., Ambrogio G., Gagliardi F. (2024). Cumulative energy demand analysis in the current manufacturing and end-of-life strategies for a polymeric composite at different fibre-matrix combinations. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 449 [10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141775].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S095965262401223X-main.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 5.89 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.89 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/631853
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact