Background Scaphoid waist fractures are often treated using headless compression screws using dorsal or volar approaches. Objectives The purpose of this study is to compare differences in screw position using a volar (retrograde) or dorsal (antegrade) approach. Patients and Methods A total of 82 patients were retrospectively evaluated: 41 treated with a volar and 41 with a dorsal approach were selected. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed by three observers who rated screw location in the proximal pole, waist, and distal pole. Results Thirty-four patients (83%) in the antegrade group had central screw placement in the waist of the scaphoid in posteroanterior and lateral planes compared with 14 (34.9%) in the retrograde group ( p < 0.05). For the antegrade group, the screw was central in 217 of 246 zones (88.2%) compared with 127 of 246 (51.6%) in the retrograde group ( p < 0.05). Conclusions The dorsal antegrade approach appears to allow the surgeon to achieve central screw placement along all three scaphoid regions.
Lucenti L, Lutsky KF, Jones C, Kazarian E, Fletcher D, Beredjiklian PK (2019). Antegrade Versus Retrograde Technique for Fixation of Scaphoid Waist Fractures: A Comparison of Screw Placement. JOURNAL OF WRIST SURGERY, 9(1), 34-38 [10.1055/s-0039-1698745].
Antegrade Versus Retrograde Technique for Fixation of Scaphoid Waist Fractures: A Comparison of Screw Placement
Lucenti L;
2019-10-16
Abstract
Background Scaphoid waist fractures are often treated using headless compression screws using dorsal or volar approaches. Objectives The purpose of this study is to compare differences in screw position using a volar (retrograde) or dorsal (antegrade) approach. Patients and Methods A total of 82 patients were retrospectively evaluated: 41 treated with a volar and 41 with a dorsal approach were selected. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed by three observers who rated screw location in the proximal pole, waist, and distal pole. Results Thirty-four patients (83%) in the antegrade group had central screw placement in the waist of the scaphoid in posteroanterior and lateral planes compared with 14 (34.9%) in the retrograde group ( p < 0.05). For the antegrade group, the screw was central in 217 of 246 zones (88.2%) compared with 127 of 246 (51.6%) in the retrograde group ( p < 0.05). Conclusions The dorsal antegrade approach appears to allow the surgeon to achieve central screw placement along all three scaphoid regions.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
3. Antegrade versus retrograde.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
190.06 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
190.06 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.