Unlike what was held by Sec. A. civil n. 5119/2002, the socially typical contract of Accident insurance pursues a unitary purpose - of a straightforward nature social security - in both cases: coverage of the risk against non-fatal accidents (from United Sections, vice versa, attracted into the orbit of non-life insurance), and coverage of risk of death. Hence the validity of the exclusion clause of the recognized right to subrogation to the insurer by art. 1916 c.c. and cumulativeness
NIVARRA, L. (2023). Assicurazione contro gli infortuni vs. compensatio lucri cum damno: uno a zero e palla al centro.
Assicurazione contro gli infortuni vs. compensatio lucri cum damno: uno a zero e palla al centro
NIVARRA, L
2023-01-01
Abstract
Unlike what was held by Sec. A. civil n. 5119/2002, the socially typical contract of Accident insurance pursues a unitary purpose - of a straightforward nature social security - in both cases: coverage of the risk against non-fatal accidents (from United Sections, vice versa, attracted into the orbit of non-life insurance), and coverage of risk of death. Hence the validity of the exclusion clause of the recognized right to subrogation to the insurer by art. 1916 c.c. and cumulativeness
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Assicurazione contro i danni vs. compensatio lucri cum dano. Uno a zero e palla al centro.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
3.41 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.41 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
