During the Progressive Era (1890–1920) in the U.S., the debate on women’s enfranchisement involved two opposite sides: detractors (Antis) and supporters. Detractors converged on the idea that women’s enfranchisement might have harmed the natural harmony of society, based on a strict division of roles between sexes. Supporters developed three different arguments: women’s suffrage would have reinforced the democratic system; it would have strengthened social cohesion; it would have led to several economic advantages of the society as a whole. Major American economists of the time joined the debate. The aim of this paper is to describe the position of the foremost male academic economists of the time by digging the lesser-known propaganda literature of the period. By showing the position of those who were against women’s suffrage, we point out their illiberalism which, in some cases, was actual chauvinism. By showing the arguments of those who supported women’s suffrage, we point out different nuances of endorsement: while some were in favor in the name of gender equality, others did not give up forms of biologically determinism and gender-biased stereotypes.

FIORITO LUCA, Giandomenica Becchio (2023). American Academic Male Economists and Women’s Suffrage: Another Look at Progressive-Era (Il)Liberalism. REVIEW OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 35(4), 1162-1178 [10.1080/09538259.2022.2149257].

American Academic Male Economists and Women’s Suffrage: Another Look at Progressive-Era (Il)Liberalism

FIORITO LUCA;
2023-03-01

Abstract

During the Progressive Era (1890–1920) in the U.S., the debate on women’s enfranchisement involved two opposite sides: detractors (Antis) and supporters. Detractors converged on the idea that women’s enfranchisement might have harmed the natural harmony of society, based on a strict division of roles between sexes. Supporters developed three different arguments: women’s suffrage would have reinforced the democratic system; it would have strengthened social cohesion; it would have led to several economic advantages of the society as a whole. Major American economists of the time joined the debate. The aim of this paper is to describe the position of the foremost male academic economists of the time by digging the lesser-known propaganda literature of the period. By showing the position of those who were against women’s suffrage, we point out their illiberalism which, in some cases, was actual chauvinism. By showing the arguments of those who supported women’s suffrage, we point out different nuances of endorsement: while some were in favor in the name of gender equality, others did not give up forms of biologically determinism and gender-biased stereotypes.
mar-2023
Settore STEC-01/A - Storia del pensiero economico
FIORITO LUCA, Giandomenica Becchio (2023). American Academic Male Economists and Women’s Suffrage: Another Look at Progressive-Era (Il)Liberalism. REVIEW OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 35(4), 1162-1178 [10.1080/09538259.2022.2149257].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ROPE2023.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 1.4 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.4 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/620077
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact