This study presents the excess sludge minimisation in a Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) system by an Oxic Settling Anaerobic (OSA) process. The pilot plant was fed with real wastewater and OSA was operated with two different hydraulic retention times (HRT), respectively 4 (Period II) and 6 h (Period III) and compared to an MBR (Period I). Multiple parameters/variables were monitored: sludge minimisation, nitrogen and carbon removal, membrane fouling, and biokinetic behaviour through respirometry. With respect to the current literature, greenhouse gas emissions were also here monitored, often neglected. Results demonstrated that combining MBR and OSA systems can significantly reduce excess sludge production (89.7%, in Period III and 59.7% in Period II, compared to Period I). However, Period III presented better PO4-P removal efficiencies but worse performances in the other parameters (COD, NH4 and Total Nitrogen). No substantial variation in membrane fouling was obtained over the experimental periods. Finally, the HRT increase in the anaerobic reactor promoted a N2O-N increase inside the unaerated reactors, highlighting the need for a trade-off between sludge minimisation and GHG emission.
Cosenza, A., Di Trapani, D., Bosco Mofatto, P.M., Mannina, G. (2024). Sewage sludge minimisation by OSA-MBR: A pilot plant experiment. CHEMOSPHERE, 347 [10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140695].
Sewage sludge minimisation by OSA-MBR: A pilot plant experiment
Cosenza, AlidaPrimo
;Di Trapani, DanieleSecondo
;Bosco Mofatto, Paulo MarceloPenultimo
;Mannina, Giorgio
Ultimo
2024-01-01
Abstract
This study presents the excess sludge minimisation in a Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) system by an Oxic Settling Anaerobic (OSA) process. The pilot plant was fed with real wastewater and OSA was operated with two different hydraulic retention times (HRT), respectively 4 (Period II) and 6 h (Period III) and compared to an MBR (Period I). Multiple parameters/variables were monitored: sludge minimisation, nitrogen and carbon removal, membrane fouling, and biokinetic behaviour through respirometry. With respect to the current literature, greenhouse gas emissions were also here monitored, often neglected. Results demonstrated that combining MBR and OSA systems can significantly reduce excess sludge production (89.7%, in Period III and 59.7% in Period II, compared to Period I). However, Period III presented better PO4-P removal efficiencies but worse performances in the other parameters (COD, NH4 and Total Nitrogen). No substantial variation in membrane fouling was obtained over the experimental periods. Finally, the HRT increase in the anaerobic reactor promoted a N2O-N increase inside the unaerated reactors, highlighting the need for a trade-off between sludge minimisation and GHG emission.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S004565352302965X-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
3.23 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.23 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.