Introduction CKD in adult is identifies when a value of eGFR less than 60mL/min/1.73m2. The use of the fixed thresholds shows different risks as CKD overdiagnosis in elderly people so age and gender differences should be considered. Methods We evaluated the variability of eGFR in 57.449 adults divided in four age-classes (18-40, 40-60, 60-80,80-100) considering the gender. Were included some inflammatory variables and Albumin/Creatinine for kidney injury evaluation. Also included Neutrophils/Lymphocytes and the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score. Data were analysed according to the statistical methodologies in use in our laboratory. Results Analysing 57,449 samples, 51.1% female and 48.9% male showed statistically significant difference for gender (Chi squared test = p<0.001). The higher r correlations coefficient is between age and eGFR: -0.46 (p<0.001) consequently to age’s increases eGFR decrease. The two-way factorial ANOVA revealed the significant effects of Age Class (p<0.001) and Gender (p<0.001) on eGFR. By using a multinomial multivariate logistic regression model for eGFR categories, established the six categories: G1, G2, G3a, G3b, G4 e G5. Detecting significant OR values for CKD, the subjects aged between 18 and 40 years had the lowest OR values, with a decrease of a factor of 0.01 (p<0.001), to develop G2-G5 pathological conditions than older age-classes (80-100 years). This <1 risk trend is maintained in all eGFR strata. In female also reduce the risk to be G2-G5 with respect to G1 by a factor of 0.23 (p<0.001). Analysing the inflammatory risk according to the categories of the modified Glasgow prognostic score, the subjects aged between 18 and 40 years showed the lowest OR values for mGPS2 than 80-100 years class people with a decrease by a factor of 0.03(p<0.001). This <1 risk trend across age groups is maintained in all mGPS strata. In female also appears to decrease the risk to develop a mGPS2 19 cases in males and 25 in females of a factor of 0.44 (p=0.009), given that the other variables in the model are held constant. This <1 risk trend for Gender is maintained in all mGPS strata. Conclusions This study proposes modifying the current eGFR values for CKD across age groups and by sex/gender by considering a larger population sample.

Marika Venezia, Daniele Magro, Scola Letizia, Carmela Rita Balistreri (22/09/2023-23/09/2023).Starting point for eGFR thresholds reassessment on the basis of age and sex/gender to easily differentiate age-dependent renal functional decline from chronic kidney disease (CKD) in men/women.

Starting point for eGFR thresholds reassessment on the basis of age and sex/gender to easily differentiate age-dependent renal functional decline from chronic kidney disease (CKD) in men/women

Marika Venezia
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Daniele Magro
Secondo
Investigation
;
Scola Letizia
Penultimo
Data Curation
;
Carmela Rita Balistreri
Ultimo
Supervision

Abstract

Introduction CKD in adult is identifies when a value of eGFR less than 60mL/min/1.73m2. The use of the fixed thresholds shows different risks as CKD overdiagnosis in elderly people so age and gender differences should be considered. Methods We evaluated the variability of eGFR in 57.449 adults divided in four age-classes (18-40, 40-60, 60-80,80-100) considering the gender. Were included some inflammatory variables and Albumin/Creatinine for kidney injury evaluation. Also included Neutrophils/Lymphocytes and the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score. Data were analysed according to the statistical methodologies in use in our laboratory. Results Analysing 57,449 samples, 51.1% female and 48.9% male showed statistically significant difference for gender (Chi squared test = p<0.001). The higher r correlations coefficient is between age and eGFR: -0.46 (p<0.001) consequently to age’s increases eGFR decrease. The two-way factorial ANOVA revealed the significant effects of Age Class (p<0.001) and Gender (p<0.001) on eGFR. By using a multinomial multivariate logistic regression model for eGFR categories, established the six categories: G1, G2, G3a, G3b, G4 e G5. Detecting significant OR values for CKD, the subjects aged between 18 and 40 years had the lowest OR values, with a decrease of a factor of 0.01 (p<0.001), to develop G2-G5 pathological conditions than older age-classes (80-100 years). This <1 risk trend is maintained in all eGFR strata. In female also reduce the risk to be G2-G5 with respect to G1 by a factor of 0.23 (p<0.001). Analysing the inflammatory risk according to the categories of the modified Glasgow prognostic score, the subjects aged between 18 and 40 years showed the lowest OR values for mGPS2 than 80-100 years class people with a decrease by a factor of 0.03(p<0.001). This <1 risk trend across age groups is maintained in all mGPS strata. In female also appears to decrease the risk to develop a mGPS2 19 cases in males and 25 in females of a factor of 0.44 (p=0.009), given that the other variables in the model are held constant. This <1 risk trend for Gender is maintained in all mGPS strata. Conclusions This study proposes modifying the current eGFR values for CKD across age groups and by sex/gender by considering a larger population sample.
CDK, gender, cronic disease, sex, kidney
Marika Venezia, Daniele Magro, Scola Letizia, Carmela Rita Balistreri (22/09/2023-23/09/2023).Starting point for eGFR thresholds reassessment on the basis of age and sex/gender to easily differentiate age-dependent renal functional decline from chronic kidney disease (CKD) in men/women.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
abstract-book-1.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Versione editoriale
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 1.39 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.39 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/612715
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact