This review aims to provide a comprehensive description of surgical approaches for the management of uterine sarcomas. Uterine sarcomas are rare uterine neoplasms. Frequently, diagnosis is made after hysterectomy or myomectomy scheduled for presumed benign leiomyomas. The gold standard for surgical treatment of uterine sarcomas is hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. It is possible to adopt a fertility-sparing approach for those patients who wish to maintain their fertility. The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy is controversial; in fact, removal of lymph nodes is only recommended in the case of radiological suspicion of nodal involvement. Use of a morcellator is associated with increased risk of total recurrence, intra-abdominal recurrence and death. Advanced disease management should be customized based on the patient's performance status given the uncertain role of adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment of advanced or recurrent disease remains a subject of debate, but surgery is the best approach in terms of morbidity and mortality. There are few options for management of these uterine tumours, and further studies are needed to clarify the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways of patients with a first diagnosis of uterine sarcoma and patients with relapse of uterine sarcoma. No specific evidence supports the adoption of adjuvant therapy in uterine-confined disease, and molecular/genomic profiling may be useful to identify patients at risk of recurrence.

Giannini, A., Golia D'Augè, T., Bogani, G., Laganà, A.S., Chiantera, V., Vizza, E., et al. (2023). Uterine sarcomas: A critical review of the literature. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 287, 166-170 [10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.016].

Uterine sarcomas: A critical review of the literature

Laganà, Antonio Simone;Chiantera, Vito;
2023-06-17

Abstract

This review aims to provide a comprehensive description of surgical approaches for the management of uterine sarcomas. Uterine sarcomas are rare uterine neoplasms. Frequently, diagnosis is made after hysterectomy or myomectomy scheduled for presumed benign leiomyomas. The gold standard for surgical treatment of uterine sarcomas is hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. It is possible to adopt a fertility-sparing approach for those patients who wish to maintain their fertility. The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy is controversial; in fact, removal of lymph nodes is only recommended in the case of radiological suspicion of nodal involvement. Use of a morcellator is associated with increased risk of total recurrence, intra-abdominal recurrence and death. Advanced disease management should be customized based on the patient's performance status given the uncertain role of adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment of advanced or recurrent disease remains a subject of debate, but surgery is the best approach in terms of morbidity and mortality. There are few options for management of these uterine tumours, and further studies are needed to clarify the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways of patients with a first diagnosis of uterine sarcoma and patients with relapse of uterine sarcoma. No specific evidence supports the adoption of adjuvant therapy in uterine-confined disease, and molecular/genomic profiling may be useful to identify patients at risk of recurrence.
17-giu-2023
Giannini, A., Golia D'Augè, T., Bogani, G., Laganà, A.S., Chiantera, V., Vizza, E., et al. (2023). Uterine sarcomas: A critical review of the literature. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 287, 166-170 [10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.016].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
487 - Sarcoma review, EJOGRB.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Full text
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 453 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
453 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/597273
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact