As it stands, the construction sector accounts for a significant proportion of global emissions. The majority of these emissions can be associated with material production. As a result, the importance of quantifying these environmental impacts is continually increasing. However, there is a current lack of guidance and methodologies regarding how to benchmark the impacts of construction products, and thus achieve more transparent environmental reporting and decision-making. Therefore, the aim of this study was to review engineering life-cycle assessment (LCA) literature and applicable standards to identify the key methodological variables required and the key steps for a sector-wide methodology. This was carried out via a bibliographic search for indexed, peer-reviewed journal publications and conference proceedings, project reports, and standards for constructed assets. From the search conducted, 23 documents and 4 standards were selected for review as relevant for this study. As a result, five key constituent methodological variables (study scope; model typology; benchmark approach; database selection; benchmark type) and three key steps (data collection; LCA; benchmark generation, with the option for Data Envelopment Analysis) were identified. Furthermore, considering the novel ISO 21678:2020, specific benchmark pathways were defined for the four types of benchmark values which can be obtained: limit, reference, short- and long-term. The definition of this set of steps, key methodological variables and the authors' recommendations for the construction sector constitute the first LCA benchmarking methodology on this field.

Mattinzioli T., Lo Presti D., Jimenez del Barco Carrion A. (2022). A critical review of life cycle assessment benchmarking methodologies for construction materials. SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 33, e00496 [10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00496].

A critical review of life cycle assessment benchmarking methodologies for construction materials

Lo Presti D.;
2022-09-21

Abstract

As it stands, the construction sector accounts for a significant proportion of global emissions. The majority of these emissions can be associated with material production. As a result, the importance of quantifying these environmental impacts is continually increasing. However, there is a current lack of guidance and methodologies regarding how to benchmark the impacts of construction products, and thus achieve more transparent environmental reporting and decision-making. Therefore, the aim of this study was to review engineering life-cycle assessment (LCA) literature and applicable standards to identify the key methodological variables required and the key steps for a sector-wide methodology. This was carried out via a bibliographic search for indexed, peer-reviewed journal publications and conference proceedings, project reports, and standards for constructed assets. From the search conducted, 23 documents and 4 standards were selected for review as relevant for this study. As a result, five key constituent methodological variables (study scope; model typology; benchmark approach; database selection; benchmark type) and three key steps (data collection; LCA; benchmark generation, with the option for Data Envelopment Analysis) were identified. Furthermore, considering the novel ISO 21678:2020, specific benchmark pathways were defined for the four types of benchmark values which can be obtained: limit, reference, short- and long-term. The definition of this set of steps, key methodological variables and the authors' recommendations for the construction sector constitute the first LCA benchmarking methodology on this field.
21-set-2022
Settore ICAR/04 - Strade, Ferrovie Ed Aeroporti
Mattinzioli T., Lo Presti D., Jimenez del Barco Carrion A. (2022). A critical review of life cycle assessment benchmarking methodologies for construction materials. SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 33, e00496 [10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00496].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Mattinzolit et al 2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 1.65 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.65 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/595113
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact