The article scrutinises the main narratives adopted by the E.U., the U.S. and China in the fight for digital sovereignty. It analyses the ongoing dialogue between legal systems that is taking place in the digital sphere to ponder on the role of comparative law in this dialogue. With legal systems called to apply a territorial law to a global phenomenon, comparative law proves to be a fundamental tool in the dispute for digital sovereignty, widely employed across legal formants, with a critical role in creating a distinctive identity for the legal systems.
smorto (2023). Il ruolo della comparazione giuridica nella contesa per la sovranità digitale. DPCE ONLINE(1), 339-369 [10.57660/dpceonline.2023.1810].
Il ruolo della comparazione giuridica nella contesa per la sovranità digitale
smorto
2023-01-01
Abstract
The article scrutinises the main narratives adopted by the E.U., the U.S. and China in the fight for digital sovereignty. It analyses the ongoing dialogue between legal systems that is taking place in the digital sphere to ponder on the role of comparative law in this dialogue. With legal systems called to apply a territorial law to a global phenomenon, comparative law proves to be a fundamental tool in the dispute for digital sovereignty, widely employed across legal formants, with a critical role in creating a distinctive identity for the legal systems.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2023. Comparazione sovranità digitale. DPCE online.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
916.9 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
916.9 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.