Aquatic ecosystems (both marine and freshwater) have long served as model systems for exploring the role of environmental stressors on organismal performance and survival, the biogeographic distributions of populations and species, and ultimately the diversity, functioning, and stability of ecosystems (Adams, 2002; Forbes, 1887; MacArthur & Wilson, 2001; Paine, 1969; Somero et al., 2017 ). Climate change, alien species invasions, land use change, urbaniza-tion, and other anthropogenic impacts have all been demonstrated to impair aquatic ecosystems at multiple levels of biological orga-nization within aquatic ecosystems (Karr, 1991; Doney et al., 2012; Harley et al., 2006; Poloczanska et al., 2013). Consequently, ap-proaches that include biological traits (e.g., physiological, be-havioural, phenological, and functional) at multiple spatial–temporal scales are critical for forecasting responses of aquatic ecosystems to future environmental changes; from individual organisms to en-tire ecosystems (Deutsch et al., 2015; Dong et al., 2022; Sunday et al., 2014). A merger of different biological scales has great po-tential for the development of approaches to quantitatively evaluate and forecast ongoing and future responses to climate change and human activities.

Dong Y.-W., Garcia Molinos J., Larson E.R., Lin Q., Liu X., Sara' G, et al. (2022). Biological traits, geographic distributions, and species conservation in aquatic ecosystems. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 28(8), 1516-1523 [10.1111/ddi.13600].

Biological traits, geographic distributions, and species conservation in aquatic ecosystems

Sara' G;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Aquatic ecosystems (both marine and freshwater) have long served as model systems for exploring the role of environmental stressors on organismal performance and survival, the biogeographic distributions of populations and species, and ultimately the diversity, functioning, and stability of ecosystems (Adams, 2002; Forbes, 1887; MacArthur & Wilson, 2001; Paine, 1969; Somero et al., 2017 ). Climate change, alien species invasions, land use change, urbaniza-tion, and other anthropogenic impacts have all been demonstrated to impair aquatic ecosystems at multiple levels of biological orga-nization within aquatic ecosystems (Karr, 1991; Doney et al., 2012; Harley et al., 2006; Poloczanska et al., 2013). Consequently, ap-proaches that include biological traits (e.g., physiological, be-havioural, phenological, and functional) at multiple spatial–temporal scales are critical for forecasting responses of aquatic ecosystems to future environmental changes; from individual organisms to en-tire ecosystems (Deutsch et al., 2015; Dong et al., 2022; Sunday et al., 2014). A merger of different biological scales has great po-tential for the development of approaches to quantitatively evaluate and forecast ongoing and future responses to climate change and human activities.
2022
Dong Y.-W., Garcia Molinos J., Larson E.R., Lin Q., Liu X., Sara' G, et al. (2022). Biological traits, geographic distributions, and species conservation in aquatic ecosystems. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 28(8), 1516-1523 [10.1111/ddi.13600].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Dong et al 2022 Biological traits, geographic distributions, and species conservation in aquatic ecosystems.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 2.94 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.94 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/584205
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact