The IDEF techniques have been developed in projects sponsored by the US Air Force in order to describe, specify and model manufacturing systems in a structured graphical form. These techniques can be classified in two categories: the “modelling” and the “descriptive” varieties. Compares two IDEF methods (one of the modelling type and one of the descriptive type) in order to represent (model or describe) two different aspects of an industrial organization. The methods compared are IDEF0, function modelling method, and IDEF3, process flow description capture method. Concludes that when considering the sequencing of the activities in process, aiming at highlighting their eventual simultaneity, then IDEF3 is more suitable, for its capability of splitting the flow of control from a single stream into several branches or joining several branches into a single stream. However, when it is necessary to direct attention on the objects which participate in the process, whether control, input, output or mechanism, then the use of IDEF0 is preferable.

Plaia A., Carrie A. (1995). Application and assessment of IDEF3 - Process flow description capture method. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 15(1), 63-73 [10.1108/01443579510077214].

Application and assessment of IDEF3 - Process flow description capture method

Plaia A.
Primo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
1995-01-01

Abstract

The IDEF techniques have been developed in projects sponsored by the US Air Force in order to describe, specify and model manufacturing systems in a structured graphical form. These techniques can be classified in two categories: the “modelling” and the “descriptive” varieties. Compares two IDEF methods (one of the modelling type and one of the descriptive type) in order to represent (model or describe) two different aspects of an industrial organization. The methods compared are IDEF0, function modelling method, and IDEF3, process flow description capture method. Concludes that when considering the sequencing of the activities in process, aiming at highlighting their eventual simultaneity, then IDEF3 is more suitable, for its capability of splitting the flow of control from a single stream into several branches or joining several branches into a single stream. However, when it is necessary to direct attention on the objects which participate in the process, whether control, input, output or mechanism, then the use of IDEF0 is preferable.
1995
Plaia A., Carrie A. (1995). Application and assessment of IDEF3 - Process flow description capture method. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 15(1), 63-73 [10.1108/01443579510077214].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2918760.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 50.26 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
50.26 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/572504
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact