Parliamentary privileges of freedom of speech and inviolability are constitutional provisions necessary to ensure balancing between constitutional powers. The Italian Constitutional legal order shows that there should be neither an exclusive and full parliamentary jurisdiction on privileges neither a full power of judges in applying constitutional rules on parliamentary privileges: it is within the System of Judicial Guarantees of the Constitution that parliamentary privileges have the chance to be effective within a correct balance between constitutional powers. Regrettably, the Italian System of Constitutional Guarantees does not ensure a sufficient level of protection of rights of persons violated by abuses of parliamentary privileges (see the European Court of Human Rights case law concerning art. 68 par. 1 Cost. it. concerning freedom of speech in Parliament).

Cavasino, E. (2021). LAS PRERROGATIVAS DE ESTATUS Y EL LIBRE EJERCICIO DE LA ACTIVIDAD PARLAMENTARIA EN LA EXPERIENCIA ITALIANA: HISTORIA RECIENTE DE UNA BÚSQUEDA INCESANTE DEL EQUILIBRIO ENTRE PODERES CONSTITUCIONALES Y DERECHOS. TEORÍA & DERECHO(31), 318-337 [10.36151/td.2021.031].

LAS PRERROGATIVAS DE ESTATUS Y EL LIBRE EJERCICIO DE LA ACTIVIDAD PARLAMENTARIA EN LA EXPERIENCIA ITALIANA: HISTORIA RECIENTE DE UNA BÚSQUEDA INCESANTE DEL EQUILIBRIO ENTRE PODERES CONSTITUCIONALES Y DERECHOS

Cavasino, Elisa
2021-01-01

Abstract

Parliamentary privileges of freedom of speech and inviolability are constitutional provisions necessary to ensure balancing between constitutional powers. The Italian Constitutional legal order shows that there should be neither an exclusive and full parliamentary jurisdiction on privileges neither a full power of judges in applying constitutional rules on parliamentary privileges: it is within the System of Judicial Guarantees of the Constitution that parliamentary privileges have the chance to be effective within a correct balance between constitutional powers. Regrettably, the Italian System of Constitutional Guarantees does not ensure a sufficient level of protection of rights of persons violated by abuses of parliamentary privileges (see the European Court of Human Rights case law concerning art. 68 par. 1 Cost. it. concerning freedom of speech in Parliament).
2021
Settore IUS/08 - Diritto Costituzionale
Settore IUS/09 - Istituzioni Di Diritto Pubblico
Cavasino, E. (2021). LAS PRERROGATIVAS DE ESTATUS Y EL LIBRE EJERCICIO DE LA ACTIVIDAD PARLAMENTARIA EN LA EXPERIENCIA ITALIANA: HISTORIA RECIENTE DE UNA BÚSQUEDA INCESANTE DEL EQUILIBRIO ENTRE PODERES CONSTITUCIONALES Y DERECHOS. TEORÍA & DERECHO(31), 318-337 [10.36151/td.2021.031].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cavasino (17) Prerrogativas Parlamentaria TEORIA Y DERECHO 2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 172.89 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
172.89 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/570909
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact