After a short account about the state of the research on Pseudo-Hegemonius Adversus Haereses, the author focuses on the present condition of the text and makes his considerations on the genesis of the booklet as the result of a translation, here and there quite literal, from probably one Greek source, perhaps from a heresiological synthesis in Greek that was not preserved. From that point of view, some decisions taken by former editors are perhaps worth to be reconsidered, such as a conjecture that seems to become superfluous.
DI MARIA, G. (2022). Quaestiones de Pseudo-Hegemonii scripto Adversus haereses, fueritne e Graeco fonte translatum. COMMENTARIA CLASSICA, 9(2022), 79-86.
Quaestiones de Pseudo-Hegemonii scripto Adversus haereses, fueritne e Graeco fonte translatum
DI MARIA, Giorgio
2022-10-07
Abstract
After a short account about the state of the research on Pseudo-Hegemonius Adversus Haereses, the author focuses on the present condition of the text and makes his considerations on the genesis of the booklet as the result of a translation, here and there quite literal, from probably one Greek source, perhaps from a heresiological synthesis in Greek that was not preserved. From that point of view, some decisions taken by former editors are perhaps worth to be reconsidered, such as a conjecture that seems to become superfluous.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
PsHegemoniusPUBBL.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
81.08 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
81.08 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.