The essay analyses the general ban for the donation of embryos placed into cryopreservation, stated by the Italian legislation n. 40/2004. Such a prevision causes a sine die conservation not only for embryos suitable for implantation, but also for those affected by genetic defects or diseases. The essay points out that donating both types of embryos, respectively, to adoption or to scientific fertility research preserves the dignity of the cells in storage, as a will supported by the consent of both gametes’ providers to the ultimate scope of solidarity.
giaimo (2022). Cui prodest servāre? Due ipotesi di destinazione per gli embrioni crioconservati. DIRITTO DI FAMIGLIA E DELLE PERSONE(1), 254-290.
Cui prodest servāre? Due ipotesi di destinazione per gli embrioni crioconservati
giaimo
2022-01-01
Abstract
The essay analyses the general ban for the donation of embryos placed into cryopreservation, stated by the Italian legislation n. 40/2004. Such a prevision causes a sine die conservation not only for embryos suitable for implantation, but also for those affected by genetic defects or diseases. The essay points out that donating both types of embryos, respectively, to adoption or to scientific fertility research preserves the dignity of the cells in storage, as a will supported by the consent of both gametes’ providers to the ultimate scope of solidarity.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cui prodest servare? Due ipotesi di destinazione per gli embrioni crioconservati.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
278.07 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
278.07 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
