The legal framework governing proceedings before the ECtHR does not deal with cases in which victims of human rights violations are not de jure and/or de facto capable of lodging applications with the Court. In the effort of overcoming such a procedural lacuna, the Court has established a test that, taking into consideration the extreme vulnerability of the victims (such as minors and persons with disabilities) and the seriousness of the alleged violations, allows NGOs to apply as their ‘de facto representatives’, provided that some other conditions are fulfilled. The Court’s approach, however, has not been always consistent and does not guarantee predictability and legal certainty. Moreover, some of the conditions (in particular, the recognition of the alleged de facto representative’s locus standi in domestic proceedings) appear unjustified and raise serious questions of conformity with the ECtHR’s case-law. The present contribution examines the Court’s approach and proposes some interpretative correctives in the light of the principle of substantive equality in the access to (international) justice, also with the aim of harmonizing the ECHR system with other universal and regional human rights systems.

Lorenzo Acconciamessa (2021). L’ammissibilità ratione personae dei ricorsi alla Corte europea di individui estremamente vulnerabili: uguaglianza sostanziale e tutela del diritto di accesso alla giustizia internazionale. DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE, 15(2), 317-353 [10.12829/101649].

L’ammissibilità ratione personae dei ricorsi alla Corte europea di individui estremamente vulnerabili: uguaglianza sostanziale e tutela del diritto di accesso alla giustizia internazionale

Lorenzo Acconciamessa
2021

Abstract

The legal framework governing proceedings before the ECtHR does not deal with cases in which victims of human rights violations are not de jure and/or de facto capable of lodging applications with the Court. In the effort of overcoming such a procedural lacuna, the Court has established a test that, taking into consideration the extreme vulnerability of the victims (such as minors and persons with disabilities) and the seriousness of the alleged violations, allows NGOs to apply as their ‘de facto representatives’, provided that some other conditions are fulfilled. The Court’s approach, however, has not been always consistent and does not guarantee predictability and legal certainty. Moreover, some of the conditions (in particular, the recognition of the alleged de facto representative’s locus standi in domestic proceedings) appear unjustified and raise serious questions of conformity with the ECtHR’s case-law. The present contribution examines the Court’s approach and proposes some interpretative correctives in the light of the principle of substantive equality in the access to (international) justice, also with the aim of harmonizing the ECHR system with other universal and regional human rights systems.
Settore IUS/13 - Diritto Internazionale
Lorenzo Acconciamessa (2021). L’ammissibilità ratione personae dei ricorsi alla Corte europea di individui estremamente vulnerabili: uguaglianza sostanziale e tutela del diritto di accesso alla giustizia internazionale. DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE, 15(2), 317-353 [10.12829/101649].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1971-7105-29623-3.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 476.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
476.73 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/553261
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact