This paper contributes to the existing literature by investigating the scope of States’ obligations to realise women’s rights and ensure gender equality amid the COVID-19 pandemic. To this end, the analysis focuses on three areas where the gendered consequences of emergency measures have been the most widespread and/or severe: the disproportionate impact of social distancing policies enacted to curb the spread of the virus on women’s right to work (Section 2); the increased rates of gender-based domestic violence triggered by stay-at-home mandates and other emergency measures restricting the movement of people (Section 3); and the uniquely adverse consequences of the diversion of health resources towards COVID-19 management on women’s access to maternal health and legal abortion (Section 4).[6] The paper argues that specific human rights standards apply to States’ emergency response, that either forbid the adoption of measures having a disproportionate adverse impact on women or impose on States specific and/or reinforced obligations to mitigate it, as a matter of priority.
Tramontana Enzamaria (2021). Women’s rights and gender equality during the COVID-19 pandemic. QUESTIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 8, 5-28.
Women’s rights and gender equality during the COVID-19 pandemic
Tramontana Enzamaria
2021-12-30
Abstract
This paper contributes to the existing literature by investigating the scope of States’ obligations to realise women’s rights and ensure gender equality amid the COVID-19 pandemic. To this end, the analysis focuses on three areas where the gendered consequences of emergency measures have been the most widespread and/or severe: the disproportionate impact of social distancing policies enacted to curb the spread of the virus on women’s right to work (Section 2); the increased rates of gender-based domestic violence triggered by stay-at-home mandates and other emergency measures restricting the movement of people (Section 3); and the uniquely adverse consequences of the diversion of health resources towards COVID-19 management on women’s access to maternal health and legal abortion (Section 4).[6] The paper argues that specific human rights standards apply to States’ emergency response, that either forbid the adoption of measures having a disproportionate adverse impact on women or impose on States specific and/or reinforced obligations to mitigate it, as a matter of priority.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
02_Women-Covid-19_TRAMONTANA_FIN_Rev-1.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
302.98 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
302.98 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.