In his latest book Massimo La Torre makes a number of criticisms to legal positivism. Most of them are convincing. In this essay I try to reply to the few I disagree with. In particular, I deal with La Torre’s objections against Hart’s theories on legal interpretation and the internal point of view and against Raz’s theory of legitimate authority. In the last paragraph I outline some ideological reasons for not considering legal positivism entirely dead.

Schiavello, A. (2021). Ciò che è vivo del positivismo giuridico. NOTIZIE DI POLITEIA, XXXVII(143), 117-125.

Ciò che è vivo del positivismo giuridico

Schiavello, A
2021-01-01

Abstract

In his latest book Massimo La Torre makes a number of criticisms to legal positivism. Most of them are convincing. In this essay I try to reply to the few I disagree with. In particular, I deal with La Torre’s objections against Hart’s theories on legal interpretation and the internal point of view and against Raz’s theory of legitimate authority. In the last paragraph I outline some ideological reasons for not considering legal positivism entirely dead.
2021
Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia Del Diritto
Schiavello, A. (2021). Ciò che è vivo del positivismo giuridico. NOTIZIE DI POLITEIA, XXXVII(143), 117-125.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
su La Torre.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 211.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
211.45 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/522100
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact