The right to silence, although being a long-term established principle in our criminal process, is currently going through a new evolutionary stage, as a result of a recent ruling of the European Court of Justice. The new judgment, delivered on instigation of the Constitutional Court, has extended the scope of the right to silence to the whole “criminal law” area. Indeed, this decision offers the opportunity to carry out a critical analysis of certain institutes of our criminal process which, also in the light of other systems’ practices, conflict with the protection of the nemo tenetur se detegere principle.
MANGIARACINA A. (2021). Nuove fisionomie del diritto al silenzio. Un'occasione per riflettere sui vuoti domestici...e non solo. PROCESSO PENALE E GIUSTIZIA(4), 729-745.
Nuove fisionomie del diritto al silenzio. Un'occasione per riflettere sui vuoti domestici...e non solo
MANGIARACINA A.
2021-01-01
Abstract
The right to silence, although being a long-term established principle in our criminal process, is currently going through a new evolutionary stage, as a result of a recent ruling of the European Court of Justice. The new judgment, delivered on instigation of the Constitutional Court, has extended the scope of the right to silence to the whole “criminal law” area. Indeed, this decision offers the opportunity to carry out a critical analysis of certain institutes of our criminal process which, also in the light of other systems’ practices, conflict with the protection of the nemo tenetur se detegere principle.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Mangiaracina PPG 2021, n. 4.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
392.25 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
392.25 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.