This study focuses on two types of heavy work investment, namely workaholism and work engagement, and on psychological detachment from work. Both workaholism and work engagement refer to an intense work effort, yet with a different impact on work and personal life. Building on Stressor–Detachment Model (SDM), we examine how different levels of workaholism, work engagement, and psychological detachment influence different outcomes related to employees’ well-being (i.e., perceived health, negative affectivity, positive affectivity). Data were collected from 342 employees via online survey and analyzed by mean of latent profile analysis. Five employee profiles were identified: High-Detachment and Engaged, Heavy Work Investors, Mild-Detachment and Disengaged, Mild-Detachment and Engaged, and Pure Workaholics. The profiles showed different patterns of the outcomes under investigation. Our findings also indicate that psychological detachment is an important factor that alleviates the detrimental effects of heavy work investment on employees’ well-being and that work engagement can play an immediate protecting role for employees’ well-being even in absence of significant levels of psychological detachment.

Gaudiino M., Di Stefano G. (2023). To detach or not to detach? The role of psychological detachment on the relationship between heavy work investment and well-being: A latent profile analysis. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 42(8), 6667-6681 [10.1007/s12144-021-01958-3].

To detach or not to detach? The role of psychological detachment on the relationship between heavy work investment and well-being: A latent profile analysis

Di Stefano G.
Ultimo
Methodology
2023-01-01

Abstract

This study focuses on two types of heavy work investment, namely workaholism and work engagement, and on psychological detachment from work. Both workaholism and work engagement refer to an intense work effort, yet with a different impact on work and personal life. Building on Stressor–Detachment Model (SDM), we examine how different levels of workaholism, work engagement, and psychological detachment influence different outcomes related to employees’ well-being (i.e., perceived health, negative affectivity, positive affectivity). Data were collected from 342 employees via online survey and analyzed by mean of latent profile analysis. Five employee profiles were identified: High-Detachment and Engaged, Heavy Work Investors, Mild-Detachment and Disengaged, Mild-Detachment and Engaged, and Pure Workaholics. The profiles showed different patterns of the outcomes under investigation. Our findings also indicate that psychological detachment is an important factor that alleviates the detrimental effects of heavy work investment on employees’ well-being and that work engagement can play an immediate protecting role for employees’ well-being even in absence of significant levels of psychological detachment.
2023
Settore M-PSI/06 - Psicologia Del Lavoro E Delle Organizzazioni
Gaudiino M., Di Stefano G. (2023). To detach or not to detach? The role of psychological detachment on the relationship between heavy work investment and well-being: A latent profile analysis. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 42(8), 6667-6681 [10.1007/s12144-021-01958-3].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gaudiino-DiStefano2021_Article_ToDetachOrNotToDetachTheRoleOf.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 560.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
560.34 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Gaudiino-Stefano2021_Article_CorrectionToToDetachOrNotToDet.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: nota dell'editore
Tipologia: Altro materiale (es. dati della ricerca)
Dimensione 116.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
116.83 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
s12144-021-01958-3.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 568.74 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
568.74 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/515349
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact