Purpose: To investigate single-day time-to-exhaustion (TTE) and time-trial (TT) -based laboratory tests values of critical power (CP), W prime (W0), and respective oxygen-uptake-kinetic responses. Methods: Twelve cyclists performed a maximal ramp test followed by 3 TTE and 3 TT efforts interspersed by 60 min recovery between efforts. Oxygen uptake (VO 2) was measured during all trials. The mean response time was calculated as a description of the overall VO 2-kinetic response from the onset to 2 min of exercise. Results: TTE-determined CP was 279 ± 52 W, and TT-determined CP was 276 ± 50 W (P = .237). Values of W0 were 14.3 ± 3.4 kJ (TTE W0) and 16.5 ± 4.2 kJ (TT W0) (P = .028). While a high level of agreement (?12 to 17 W) and a low prediction error of 2.7% were established for CP, for W0 limits of agreements were markedly lower (?8 to 3.7 kJ), with a prediction error of 18.8%. The mean standard error for TTE CP values was significantly higher than that for TT CP values (2.4% ± 1.9% vs 1.2% ± 0.7% W). The standard errors for TTE W0 and TT W0 were 11.2% ± 8.1% and 5.6% ± 3.6%, respectively. The VO 2 response was significantly faster during TT (~22 s) than TTE (~28 s). Conclusions: The TT protocol with a 60-min recovery period offers a valid, time-saving, and less error-filled alternative to conventional and more recent testing methods. Results, however, cannot be transferred to W0.

Karsten B., Baker J., Naclerio F., Klose A., Bianco A., Nimmerichter A. (2018). Time trials versus time-to-exhaustion tests: Effects on critical power, W0, and oxygen-uptake kinetics. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 13(2), 183-188 [10.1123/ijspp.2016-0761].

Time trials versus time-to-exhaustion tests: Effects on critical power, W0, and oxygen-uptake kinetics

Bianco A.;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate single-day time-to-exhaustion (TTE) and time-trial (TT) -based laboratory tests values of critical power (CP), W prime (W0), and respective oxygen-uptake-kinetic responses. Methods: Twelve cyclists performed a maximal ramp test followed by 3 TTE and 3 TT efforts interspersed by 60 min recovery between efforts. Oxygen uptake (VO 2) was measured during all trials. The mean response time was calculated as a description of the overall VO 2-kinetic response from the onset to 2 min of exercise. Results: TTE-determined CP was 279 ± 52 W, and TT-determined CP was 276 ± 50 W (P = .237). Values of W0 were 14.3 ± 3.4 kJ (TTE W0) and 16.5 ± 4.2 kJ (TT W0) (P = .028). While a high level of agreement (?12 to 17 W) and a low prediction error of 2.7% were established for CP, for W0 limits of agreements were markedly lower (?8 to 3.7 kJ), with a prediction error of 18.8%. The mean standard error for TTE CP values was significantly higher than that for TT CP values (2.4% ± 1.9% vs 1.2% ± 0.7% W). The standard errors for TTE W0 and TT W0 were 11.2% ± 8.1% and 5.6% ± 3.6%, respectively. The VO 2 response was significantly faster during TT (~22 s) than TTE (~28 s). Conclusions: The TT protocol with a 60-min recovery period offers a valid, time-saving, and less error-filled alternative to conventional and more recent testing methods. Results, however, cannot be transferred to W0.
2018
Karsten B., Baker J., Naclerio F., Klose A., Bianco A., Nimmerichter A. (2018). Time trials versus time-to-exhaustion tests: Effects on critical power, W0, and oxygen-uptake kinetics. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 13(2), 183-188 [10.1123/ijspp.2016-0761].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Karstenetal.2017TimeTrialsversusTimetoExhaustionTests_EffectsonCriticalPowerWandOxygenUptakeKinetics_2017-2-23.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 576.59 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
576.59 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/481983
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact