After several years, the European Court of Human Rights comes back on the case of Dan v. Moldova: a judgment that has had a significant impact on our appeal process. The key question is whether a new shock wave is to be expected by this further ruling.
MANGIARACINA A. (2020). Dan v. Moldavia 2: la rinnovazione in appello tra itinerari sperimentati e cedimenti silenziosi. ARCHIVIO PENALE(3), 1-20.
Dan v. Moldavia 2: la rinnovazione in appello tra itinerari sperimentati e cedimenti silenziosi
MANGIARACINA A.
2020-01-01
Abstract
After several years, the European Court of Human Rights comes back on the case of Dan v. Moldova: a judgment that has had a significant impact on our appeal process. The key question is whether a new shock wave is to be expected by this further ruling.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mangiaracina-Dan c. Moldavia.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
285.91 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
285.91 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
