The aim of this prospective clinical study is compare short-term outcome of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using the Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME group) with patients who underwent conventional right-sided colonic resection (NCME group).

Di Buono, G., Buscemi, S., Cocorullo, G., Sorce, V., Amato, G., Bonventre, G., et al. (2021). Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: Short-Term Outcomes. A Randomized Clinical Study. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 274(1), 57-62 [10.1097/SLA.0000000000004557].

Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: Short-Term Outcomes. A Randomized Clinical Study

Di Buono, Giuseppe
Primo
;
Buscemi, Salvatore
Secondo
;
Cocorullo, Gianfranco;Sorce, Vincenzo;Amato, Giuseppe;Bonventre, Giulia;Maienza, Elisa;Galia, Massimo;Gulotta, Leonardo;Romano, Giorgio
Penultimo
;
Agrusa, Antonino
Ultimo
2021-07-01

Abstract

The aim of this prospective clinical study is compare short-term outcome of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using the Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME group) with patients who underwent conventional right-sided colonic resection (NCME group).
lug-2021
Di Buono, G., Buscemi, S., Cocorullo, G., Sorce, V., Amato, G., Bonventre, G., et al. (2021). Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: Short-Term Outcomes. A Randomized Clinical Study. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 274(1), 57-62 [10.1097/SLA.0000000000004557].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Buscemi.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 3.47 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.47 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/455844
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 21
  • Scopus 65
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 58
social impact