The kinematics of the action formed by reaching-grasping an object and placing it on a second target was studied in a patient who suffered from an acute vascular left brain lesion, which affected the Supplementary Motor Area proper (SMA-proper) (Matelli M, Luppino G. Thalamic input to mesial and superior area 6 in the macaque monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1996;372:59-87, Matelli M, Luppino G, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G. Thalamic input to inferior area 6 and area 4 in the macaque monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1989;280:468-488), and in five healthy control subjects. The reach kinematics of the controls was affected by the positions of both the reaching-grasping and the placing targets (Gentilucci M, Negrotti A, Gangitano M. Planning an action. Experimental Brain Research 1997;115:116- 28). In contrast, the reach kinematics of the patient was affected only by the position of the reaching-grasping target. By comparing these results with those previously found in Parkinson's disease patients executing the same action (Gentilucci M, Negrotti A. Planning and executing an action in Parkinson's disease patients. Movement Disorders 1999;1:69-79, Gentilucci M, Negrotti A. The control of an action in Parkinson's disease. Experimental Brain Research 1999;129:269-277), we suggest that the anatomical 'motor' circuit formed by SMA-proper (see above), Basal Ganglia (BG) and Thalamus (Alexander GE, Crutcher MD. Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing. Trends in the Neurosciences 1990;13:266-271, Hoover JE, Strick PL. Multiple output channels in the basal ganglia. Nature 1993;259:819-821) may be involved in the control of actions: SMA-proper assembles the sequence of the action, whereas BG updates its parameters and stores them. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Gentilucci M., Bertolani L., Benuzzi F., Negrotti A., Pavesi G., Gangitano M. (2000). Impaired control of an action after supplementary motor area lesion: A case study. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 38(10), 1398-1404 [10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00044-0].

Impaired control of an action after supplementary motor area lesion: A case study

Gangitano M.
2000-01-01

Abstract

The kinematics of the action formed by reaching-grasping an object and placing it on a second target was studied in a patient who suffered from an acute vascular left brain lesion, which affected the Supplementary Motor Area proper (SMA-proper) (Matelli M, Luppino G. Thalamic input to mesial and superior area 6 in the macaque monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1996;372:59-87, Matelli M, Luppino G, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G. Thalamic input to inferior area 6 and area 4 in the macaque monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology 1989;280:468-488), and in five healthy control subjects. The reach kinematics of the controls was affected by the positions of both the reaching-grasping and the placing targets (Gentilucci M, Negrotti A, Gangitano M. Planning an action. Experimental Brain Research 1997;115:116- 28). In contrast, the reach kinematics of the patient was affected only by the position of the reaching-grasping target. By comparing these results with those previously found in Parkinson's disease patients executing the same action (Gentilucci M, Negrotti A. Planning and executing an action in Parkinson's disease patients. Movement Disorders 1999;1:69-79, Gentilucci M, Negrotti A. The control of an action in Parkinson's disease. Experimental Brain Research 1999;129:269-277), we suggest that the anatomical 'motor' circuit formed by SMA-proper (see above), Basal Ganglia (BG) and Thalamus (Alexander GE, Crutcher MD. Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing. Trends in the Neurosciences 1990;13:266-271, Hoover JE, Strick PL. Multiple output channels in the basal ganglia. Nature 1993;259:819-821) may be involved in the control of actions: SMA-proper assembles the sequence of the action, whereas BG updates its parameters and stores them. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd.
2000
Gentilucci M., Bertolani L., Benuzzi F., Negrotti A., Pavesi G., Gangitano M. (2000). Impaired control of an action after supplementary motor area lesion: A case study. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 38(10), 1398-1404 [10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00044-0].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gentilucci00c.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 355 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
355 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/436989
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact