This paper proposes a critical analysis of Bruno Celano’s normative legal positivism. The main objections focuses on four crucial points of Celano’s theory: 1) the distinction between descriptive and normative jurisprudence, which is not taken in due account; 2) the underestimation of the role of interpretation in the legal domain; 3) the acritical acceptance of the source thesis; 4) the attempt of reconciling a procedural ideal of the Rule of Law with the substantial values of the contemporary constitutional States.
A. Schiavello (2019). La botte piena e la moglie ubriaca, ovvero: i limiti del positivismo giuridico di Bruno Celano. In M. Maldonado, P. Luque (a cura di), Discutendo con Bruno Celano (pp. 253-276). Madrid, Barcelona, Buenos Aires, São Paulo : Marcial Pons.
La botte piena e la moglie ubriaca, ovvero: i limiti del positivismo giuridico di Bruno Celano
A. Schiavello
2019-01-01
Abstract
This paper proposes a critical analysis of Bruno Celano’s normative legal positivism. The main objections focuses on four crucial points of Celano’s theory: 1) the distinction between descriptive and normative jurisprudence, which is not taken in due account; 2) the underestimation of the role of interpretation in the legal domain; 3) the acritical acceptance of the source thesis; 4) the attempt of reconciling a procedural ideal of the Rule of Law with the substantial values of the contemporary constitutional States.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Su Celano.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
2.41 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.41 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
