In order to characterise the environmental performance of additive manufacturing (AM) processes, comparative analyses are required. Different manufacturing approaches (such as additive and subtractive ones), besides adopting different equipment, use different kinds and amounts of material. Therefore, the material-related flow has to be followed throughout the entire product life. Differences in environmental impact arise at each step of the life cycle: material production, manufacturing, use, disposal, and transportation. A life cycle-based methodology able to take due account of all the factors of influence on the total energy demand for the production of metal components is given in this paper. Decision support tools for identifying the most sustainable manufacturing route (subtractive versus AM-based approaches) are presented for different scenarios. The aim of the present paper is to contribute to the debate concerning the environmental impact characterisation of AM processes.

Ingarao G., Priarone P.C., Di Lorenzo R., Settineri L. (2020). Guidelines to compare additive and subtractive manufacturing approaches under the energy demand perspective. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING, 4(2-4), 266-280 [10.1504/IJSM.2020.107126].

Guidelines to compare additive and subtractive manufacturing approaches under the energy demand perspective

Ingarao G.
;
Di Lorenzo R.;Settineri L.
2020

Abstract

In order to characterise the environmental performance of additive manufacturing (AM) processes, comparative analyses are required. Different manufacturing approaches (such as additive and subtractive ones), besides adopting different equipment, use different kinds and amounts of material. Therefore, the material-related flow has to be followed throughout the entire product life. Differences in environmental impact arise at each step of the life cycle: material production, manufacturing, use, disposal, and transportation. A life cycle-based methodology able to take due account of all the factors of influence on the total energy demand for the production of metal components is given in this paper. Decision support tools for identifying the most sustainable manufacturing route (subtractive versus AM-based approaches) are presented for different scenarios. The aim of the present paper is to contribute to the debate concerning the environmental impact characterisation of AM processes.
Ingarao G., Priarone P.C., Di Lorenzo R., Settineri L. (2020). Guidelines to compare additive and subtractive manufacturing approaches under the energy demand perspective. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING, 4(2-4), 266-280 [10.1504/IJSM.2020.107126].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
IJSM0402-0410 INGARAO_246156 (1).pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 325.37 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
325.37 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10447/421629
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact