Archivio istituzionale della ricerca dell'Università degli Studi di Palermo
IRIS è il sistema di gestione integrata dei dati della ricerca (persone, pubblicazioni, progetti, attività) adottato dall’Università di Palermo, e ha lo scopo di raccogliere, conservare, documentare, e diffondere ad accesso aperto le informazioni relative alla produzione scientifica degli autori afferenti all’Ateneo.
EnglishDecision-making in the presence of intangible elements must be based on a robust, but subtle, balance between expert know-how and judgment consistency when eliciting that know-how. This balance is frequently achieved as a trade-off reached after a feedback process softens the tension frequently found between one force steadily pulling towards (full) consistency, and another force driven by expert feeling and opinion. The linearization method, developed by the authors in the framework of the analytic hierarchy process, is a pull-towards-consistency mechanism that shows the path from an inconsistent body of judgment elicited from an expert towards consistency, by suggesting optimal changes to the expert opinions. However, experts may be reluctant to alter some of their issued opinions, and may wish to impose constraints on the adjustments suggested by the consistency-enforcement mechanism. In this paper, using the classical Riesz representation theorem, the linearization method is accommodated to consider various types of constraints imposed by experts during the abovementioned feedback process.
Benítez, J., Carpitella, S., Certa, A., & Izquierdo, J. (2020). Constrained consistency enforcement in AHP. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 380.
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2020 |
| Titolo: | Constrained consistency enforcement in AHP |
| Autori: | |
| Citazione: | Benítez, J., Carpitella, S., Certa, A., & Izquierdo, J. (2020). Constrained consistency enforcement in AHP. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 380. |
| Rivista: | |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2020.125273 |
| Abstract: | Decision-making in the presence of intangible elements must be based on a robust, but subtle, balance between expert know-how and judgment consistency when eliciting that know-how. This balance is frequently achieved as a trade-off reached after a feedback process softens the tension frequently found between one force steadily pulling towards (full) consistency, and another force driven by expert feeling and opinion. The linearization method, developed by the authors in the framework of the analytic hierarchy process, is a pull-towards-consistency mechanism that shows the path from an inconsistent body of judgment elicited from an expert towards consistency, by suggesting optimal changes to the expert opinions. However, experts may be reluctant to alter some of their issued opinions, and may wish to impose constraints on the adjustments suggested by the consistency-enforcement mechanism. In this paper, using the classical Riesz representation theorem, the linearization method is accommodated to consider various types of constraints imposed by experts during the abovementioned feedback process. |
| Settore Scientifico Disciplinare: | Settore ING-IND/17 - Impianti Industriali Meccanici |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.01 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMC-D-18-04814.pdf | Pre-print | Open Access Visualizza/Apri | ||
| Constrained consistency enforcement in AHP.pdf | Articolo principale | Versione Editoriale | Administrator Richiedi una copia |
http://hdl.handle.net/10447/415889
Copyright © 2021