The aim of this paper is to examine whether and to what extent bank capital requirements and liquidity standards influence the level of bank stability. Our approach is that both capital and liquidity affect lending growth, which in turn affects bank stability. We construct a panel dataset on a sample of 2,054 commercial banks from 117 developed and developing countries during the 2000–16 period. By applying a two-stage least squares (2SLS) empirical methodology, our findings show that capital and liquidity have a negative direct impact on the level of bank stability. However, this influence is counteracted by an indirect positive effect through the increased level of credit. Our results are not homogeneous across legal and institutional environments. In particular, we provide evidence on more relevant relationships in countries with higher level of protection of creditor rights and lower restrictions on non-traditional banking activities. Our empirical findings are robust to different specifications of the empirical model and to potential endogeneity problems.

Scannella E, Polizzi S, Suarez N (2020). The Role of Capital and Liquidity in Bank Lending: Are Banks Safer?. GLOBAL POLICY, 11(1), 28-38 [10.1111/1758-5899.12750].

The Role of Capital and Liquidity in Bank Lending: Are Banks Safer?

Scannella E
;
Polizzi S
;
2020-01-01

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine whether and to what extent bank capital requirements and liquidity standards influence the level of bank stability. Our approach is that both capital and liquidity affect lending growth, which in turn affects bank stability. We construct a panel dataset on a sample of 2,054 commercial banks from 117 developed and developing countries during the 2000–16 period. By applying a two-stage least squares (2SLS) empirical methodology, our findings show that capital and liquidity have a negative direct impact on the level of bank stability. However, this influence is counteracted by an indirect positive effect through the increased level of credit. Our results are not homogeneous across legal and institutional environments. In particular, we provide evidence on more relevant relationships in countries with higher level of protection of creditor rights and lower restrictions on non-traditional banking activities. Our empirical findings are robust to different specifications of the empirical model and to potential endogeneity problems.
Settore SECS-P/11 - Economia Degli Intermediari Finanziari
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1758-5899.12750
Scannella E, Polizzi S, Suarez N (2020). The Role of Capital and Liquidity in Bank Lending: Are Banks Safer?. GLOBAL POLICY, 11(1), 28-38 [10.1111/1758-5899.12750].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Capital Liquidity Bank Lending - Global Policy - January 2020.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 428.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
428.21 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/394177
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact