The immune system deploys a multitude of innate and adaptive mechanisms not only to ward off pathogens but also to prevent malignant transformation ("immune surveillance"). Hence, a clinically apparent tumor already reflects selection for those malignant cell clones capable of evading immune recognition ("immune evasion"). Metal drugs, besides their well-investigated cytotoxic anticancer effects, massively interact with the cancer-immune interface and can reverse important aspects of immune evasion. This topic has recently gained intense attention based on combination approaches with anticancer immunotherapy (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors), a strategy recently delivering first exciting results in clinical settings. This review summarizes the promising but still extremely fragmentary knowledge on the interplay of metal drugs with the fidelity of anticancer immune responses but also their role in adverse effects. It highlights that, at least in some cases, metal drugs can induce long-lasting anticancer immune responses. Important steps in this process comprise altered visibility and susceptibility of cancer cells toward innate and adaptive immunity, as well as direct impacts on immune cell populations and the tumor microenvironment. On the basis of the gathered information, we suggest initiating joint multidisciplinary programs to implement comprehensive immune analyses into strategies to develop novel and smart anticancer metal compounds.

Englinger, B., Pirker, C., Heffeter, P., Terenzi, A., Kowol, C.R., Keppler, B.K., et al. (2019). Metal drugs and the anticancer immune response. CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 119(2), 1519-1624 [10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00396].

Metal drugs and the anticancer immune response

Terenzi A.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

The immune system deploys a multitude of innate and adaptive mechanisms not only to ward off pathogens but also to prevent malignant transformation ("immune surveillance"). Hence, a clinically apparent tumor already reflects selection for those malignant cell clones capable of evading immune recognition ("immune evasion"). Metal drugs, besides their well-investigated cytotoxic anticancer effects, massively interact with the cancer-immune interface and can reverse important aspects of immune evasion. This topic has recently gained intense attention based on combination approaches with anticancer immunotherapy (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors), a strategy recently delivering first exciting results in clinical settings. This review summarizes the promising but still extremely fragmentary knowledge on the interplay of metal drugs with the fidelity of anticancer immune responses but also their role in adverse effects. It highlights that, at least in some cases, metal drugs can induce long-lasting anticancer immune responses. Important steps in this process comprise altered visibility and susceptibility of cancer cells toward innate and adaptive immunity, as well as direct impacts on immune cell populations and the tumor microenvironment. On the basis of the gathered information, we suggest initiating joint multidisciplinary programs to implement comprehensive immune analyses into strategies to develop novel and smart anticancer metal compounds.
2019
Englinger, B., Pirker, C., Heffeter, P., Terenzi, A., Kowol, C.R., Keppler, B.K., et al. (2019). Metal drugs and the anticancer immune response. CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 119(2), 1519-1624 [10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00396].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
045_2019_ChemRev_MetalImmune.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 11.68 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
11.68 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
ChemRev Terenzi.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print
Dimensione 5.75 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.75 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/392797
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 70
  • Scopus 260
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 252
social impact