The article analyses the extension of the term in the fixed-term contract in the framework of Legislative Decree n. 81/2015, both before and after the changes enacted by the l. n. 96/2018 (so-called Decreto Dignità, Dignity Decree). It lacks a specific rule concerning the form that the extension’s agreement has to have. Therefore, the author outlines the reasons why the written is required for the validity of such a deal. Moreover, this, especially in the cases where the term’s extension does not require a justification. That conclusion comes from a systematic interpretation of the rules established by the articles 21 ff., of the Legislative Decree no. 81/2015. Consequently, because the written-form is a measure to protect the weakest part against the risk of the abuse deriving from the repetition of the fixed-term contracts, it ought to be mandatory at least in compliance with the requirement of the effectiveness of the anti-abuse measures required by EU law.

riccobono a (2019). DAL «JOBS ACT» AL «DECRETO DIGNITÀ»: OSSERVAZIONI CRITICHE SULLA PROROGA DEL CONTRATTO A TERMINE. TEMILAVORO.IT SINOSSI INTERNET DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DELLA SICUREZZA SOCIALE.

DAL «JOBS ACT» AL «DECRETO DIGNITÀ»: OSSERVAZIONI CRITICHE SULLA PROROGA DEL CONTRATTO A TERMINE

riccobono a
2019-01-01

Abstract

The article analyses the extension of the term in the fixed-term contract in the framework of Legislative Decree n. 81/2015, both before and after the changes enacted by the l. n. 96/2018 (so-called Decreto Dignità, Dignity Decree). It lacks a specific rule concerning the form that the extension’s agreement has to have. Therefore, the author outlines the reasons why the written is required for the validity of such a deal. Moreover, this, especially in the cases where the term’s extension does not require a justification. That conclusion comes from a systematic interpretation of the rules established by the articles 21 ff., of the Legislative Decree no. 81/2015. Consequently, because the written-form is a measure to protect the weakest part against the risk of the abuse deriving from the repetition of the fixed-term contracts, it ought to be mandatory at least in compliance with the requirement of the effectiveness of the anti-abuse measures required by EU law.
Settore IUS/07 - Diritto Del Lavoro
riccobono a (2019). DAL «JOBS ACT» AL «DECRETO DIGNITÀ»: OSSERVAZIONI CRITICHE SULLA PROROGA DEL CONTRATTO A TERMINE. TEMILAVORO.IT SINOSSI INTERNET DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DELLA SICUREZZA SOCIALE.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
riccobono temilavoro 2019 termine.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 382.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
382.94 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/387707
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact