The article analyses the extension of the term in the fixed-term contract in the framework of Legislative Decree n. 81/2015, both before and after the changes enacted by the l. n. 96/2018 (so-called Decreto Dignità, Dignity Decree). It lacks a specific rule concerning the form that the extension’s agreement has to have. Therefore, the author outlines the reasons why the written is required for the validity of such a deal. Moreover, this, especially in the cases where the term’s extension does not require a justification. That conclusion comes from a systematic interpretation of the rules established by the articles 21 ff., of the Legislative Decree no. 81/2015. Consequently, because the written-form is a measure to protect the weakest part against the risk of the abuse deriving from the repetition of the fixed-term contracts, it ought to be mandatory at least in compliance with the requirement of the effectiveness of the anti-abuse measures required by EU law.
Riccobono, A. (2019). DAL «JOBS ACT» AL «DECRETO DIGNITÀ»: OSSERVAZIONI CRITICHE SULLA PROROGA DEL CONTRATTO A TERMINE. TEMILAVORO.IT SINOSSI INTERNET DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DELLA SICUREZZA SOCIALE.
Data di pubblicazione: | 2019 | |
Titolo: | DAL «JOBS ACT» AL «DECRETO DIGNITÀ»: OSSERVAZIONI CRITICHE SULLA PROROGA DEL CONTRATTO A TERMINE | |
Autori: | RICCOBONO, Alessandro (Corresponding) | |
Citazione: | Riccobono, A. (2019). DAL «JOBS ACT» AL «DECRETO DIGNITÀ»: OSSERVAZIONI CRITICHE SULLA PROROGA DEL CONTRATTO A TERMINE. TEMILAVORO.IT SINOSSI INTERNET DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DELLA SICUREZZA SOCIALE. | |
Rivista: | ||
Abstract: | The article analyses the extension of the term in the fixed-term contract in the framework of Legislative Decree n. 81/2015, both before and after the changes enacted by the l. n. 96/2018 (so-called Decreto Dignità, Dignity Decree). It lacks a specific rule concerning the form that the extension’s agreement has to have. Therefore, the author outlines the reasons why the written is required for the validity of such a deal. Moreover, this, especially in the cases where the term’s extension does not require a justification. That conclusion comes from a systematic interpretation of the rules established by the articles 21 ff., of the Legislative Decree no. 81/2015. Consequently, because the written-form is a measure to protect the weakest part against the risk of the abuse deriving from the repetition of the fixed-term contracts, it ought to be mandatory at least in compliance with the requirement of the effectiveness of the anti-abuse measures required by EU law. | |
Settore Scientifico Disciplinare: | Settore IUS/07 - Diritto Del Lavoro | |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.01 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
---|---|---|---|---|
riccobono temilavoro 2019 termine.pdf | Versione Editoriale | Open Access Visualizza/Apri |