The paper aims to analyze the evolution of the “ne bis in idem” prohibition in the European Union law, with a rereading in a "substantial" key, based on the so called “Engel criteria”, from recent european and national jurisprudence. More precisely, according to this interpretative orientation, this prohibition could be violated regardless of the "criminal" qualification attributed to penalties or judicial procedures aimed at punishing the same fact several times. On the basis of these considerations, it will be asked if this prohibition can operate today where competitions are sanctions or proceedings originating from different legal systems. In particular the possible violations of “ne bis in idem” principle will be analyzed regarding all the relations between the sports legal system and the state legal system.

Agrifoglio Giangabriele (2019). Autonomia ordinamentale e pluralismo giuridico: il divieto ne bis in idem tra Engel criteria e principio di proporzionalità. EUROPA E DIRITTO PRIVATO(2), 454-503.

Autonomia ordinamentale e pluralismo giuridico: il divieto ne bis in idem tra Engel criteria e principio di proporzionalità.

Agrifoglio Giangabriele
2019-01-01

Abstract

The paper aims to analyze the evolution of the “ne bis in idem” prohibition in the European Union law, with a rereading in a "substantial" key, based on the so called “Engel criteria”, from recent european and national jurisprudence. More precisely, according to this interpretative orientation, this prohibition could be violated regardless of the "criminal" qualification attributed to penalties or judicial procedures aimed at punishing the same fact several times. On the basis of these considerations, it will be asked if this prohibition can operate today where competitions are sanctions or proceedings originating from different legal systems. In particular the possible violations of “ne bis in idem” principle will be analyzed regarding all the relations between the sports legal system and the state legal system.
Settore IUS/01 - Diritto Privato
Agrifoglio Giangabriele (2019). Autonomia ordinamentale e pluralismo giuridico: il divieto ne bis in idem tra Engel criteria e principio di proporzionalità. EUROPA E DIRITTO PRIVATO(2), 454-503.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Giangabriele Agrifoglio ne bis in idem.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 217.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
217.91 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/372344
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact