This article presents a syntactic analysis of the third person subject clitic a in Camponese, a heretofore unstudied Friulian variety. Following Poletto's (2000) map of subject clitics, we argue that it bears [+third person] features, and is, in fact, the spell-out of the functional head Subj°, located in the highest projection of TP (following Rizzi & Shlonsky 2007). In the first part of the article, we offer a detailed description of the distribution and syntactic properties of the subject clitic a, identifying its position in relation to the other elements that occur in the CP and TP. In the second part we discuss two proposals put forward to account for split clitics like a-l in the related variety of Forni di Sotto, where a and l are held to be part of a single clitic al (Manzini & Savoia 2009, Calabrese & Pescarini 2014). We show that such an account is incompatible with the case of Campone, where the clitics a and l are clearly separate: l is a [uφ]-clitic (Roberts 2010) and is located lower in the TP than the clitic a. We conclude with an analysis, which proposes the integration of Poletto's (2000) typology with a fifth type, corresponding to the clitic a of Campone.

Casalicchio, J., Masutti, V. (2015). A Syntactic Analysis of the Subject Clitic "a" in the Friulian Variety of Campone. ISOGLOSS, 2015(Special Issue), 103-132 [10.5565/rev/isogloss.15].

A Syntactic Analysis of the Subject Clitic "a" in the Friulian Variety of Campone

Casalicchio, Jan;
2015-01-01

Abstract

This article presents a syntactic analysis of the third person subject clitic a in Camponese, a heretofore unstudied Friulian variety. Following Poletto's (2000) map of subject clitics, we argue that it bears [+third person] features, and is, in fact, the spell-out of the functional head Subj°, located in the highest projection of TP (following Rizzi & Shlonsky 2007). In the first part of the article, we offer a detailed description of the distribution and syntactic properties of the subject clitic a, identifying its position in relation to the other elements that occur in the CP and TP. In the second part we discuss two proposals put forward to account for split clitics like a-l in the related variety of Forni di Sotto, where a and l are held to be part of a single clitic al (Manzini & Savoia 2009, Calabrese & Pescarini 2014). We show that such an account is incompatible with the case of Campone, where the clitics a and l are clearly separate: l is a [uφ]-clitic (Roberts 2010) and is located lower in the TP than the clitic a. We conclude with an analysis, which proposes the integration of Poletto's (2000) typology with a fifth type, corresponding to the clitic a of Campone.
Settore L-LIN/01 - Glottologia E Linguistica
Settore L-FIL-LET/09 - Filologia E Linguistica Romanza
Settore L-FIL-LET/12 - Linguistica Italiana
http://revistes.uab.cat/isogloss/article/download/v1-2015-si-casalicchio-masutti/pdf
Casalicchio, J., Masutti, V. (2015). A Syntactic Analysis of the Subject Clitic "a" in the Friulian Variety of Campone. ISOGLOSS, 2015(Special Issue), 103-132 [10.5565/rev/isogloss.15].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Casalicchio-Masutti, Il clitico 'a' a Campone.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 560.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
560.82 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/371457
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact