Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional art. 41-bis, paragraph 2-quater, lett. f), ord. pen., where requires the adoption of all the necessary measures to prevent detainees, under differential rule system, from cooking food. Based on the principles set out in articles 3 and 27 of the Constitution, the decision is increasingly important as it goes beyond the relevance of the specifically addressed issue: especially as it recognizes that even those who are restricted, according to art. 41-bis ord. pen., shall keep access to “small acts of daily life”, considered particularly precious as they represent the “last residues within which individual freedom can expand”.
Parlato L (2019). Privo di ragionevole giustificazione, incongruo e inutile: censurato dalla Consulta il divieto di cuocere cibi previsto per i detenuti sottoposti al regime del “carcere duro”. PROCESSO PENALE E GIUSTIZIA(2), 375-388.
Data di pubblicazione: | 2019 | |
Titolo: | Privo di ragionevole giustificazione, incongruo e inutile: censurato dalla Consulta il divieto di cuocere cibi previsto per i detenuti sottoposti al regime del “carcere duro” | |
Autori: | ||
Citazione: | Parlato L (2019). Privo di ragionevole giustificazione, incongruo e inutile: censurato dalla Consulta il divieto di cuocere cibi previsto per i detenuti sottoposti al regime del “carcere duro”. PROCESSO PENALE E GIUSTIZIA(2), 375-388. | |
Rivista: | ||
Abstract: | Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional art. 41-bis, paragraph 2-quater, lett. f), ord. pen., where requires the adoption of all the necessary measures to prevent detainees, under differential rule system, from cooking food. Based on the principles set out in articles 3 and 27 of the Constitution, the decision is increasingly important as it goes beyond the relevance of the specifically addressed issue: especially as it recognizes that even those who are restricted, according to art. 41-bis ord. pen., shall keep access to “small acts of daily life”, considered particularly precious as they represent the “last residues within which individual freedom can expand”. | |
Settore Scientifico Disciplinare: | Settore IUS/16 - Diritto Processuale Penale | |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.01 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PPG2019Fascicolo2_2019_GugvA_ppg.pdf | Versione Editoriale | Administrator Richiedi una copia |