There is no contradiction between Kant’s statement that the proposition, “every alteration has its cause,” is of no interest to the Critique of Pure Reason because of its dependence on empirical contents (KrV, B 3) and his use of the same proposition as an example of pure a priori knowledge (KrV, B 5). There is only the arduousness and sometimes also the ambiguity of a passage in which Kant attempts to establish a new basis for the validity of the principle of causality.

Cicatello, A. (2018). Per una rilettura kantiana del principio di causalità. ANUARIO FILOSOFICO, 51(3), 485-513 [10.15581/009.51.3.485-513].

Per una rilettura kantiana del principio di causalità

Cicatello, Angelo
2018-01-01

Abstract

There is no contradiction between Kant’s statement that the proposition, “every alteration has its cause,” is of no interest to the Critique of Pure Reason because of its dependence on empirical contents (KrV, B 3) and his use of the same proposition as an example of pure a priori knowledge (KrV, B 5). There is only the arduousness and sometimes also the ambiguity of a passage in which Kant attempts to establish a new basis for the validity of the principle of causality.
2018
Settore M-FIL/01 - Filosofia Teoretica
Cicatello, A. (2018). Per una rilettura kantiana del principio di causalità. ANUARIO FILOSOFICO, 51(3), 485-513 [10.15581/009.51.3.485-513].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Per una rilettura kantiana del principio di causalità.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Pdf dell'articolo
Dimensione 1.19 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.19 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/351506
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact