There is no contradiction between Kant’s statement that the proposition, “every alteration has its cause,” is of no interest to the Critique of Pure Reason because of its dependence on empirical contents (KrV, B 3) and his use of the same proposition as an example of pure a priori knowledge (KrV, B 5). There is only the arduousness and sometimes also the ambiguity of a passage in which Kant attempts to establish a new basis for the validity of the principle of causality.
Cicatello, A. (2018). Per una rilettura kantiana del principio di causalità. ANUARIO FILOSOFICO, 51(3), 485-513 [10.15581/009.51.3.485-513].
Per una rilettura kantiana del principio di causalità
Cicatello, Angelo
2018-01-01
Abstract
There is no contradiction between Kant’s statement that the proposition, “every alteration has its cause,” is of no interest to the Critique of Pure Reason because of its dependence on empirical contents (KrV, B 3) and his use of the same proposition as an example of pure a priori knowledge (KrV, B 5). There is only the arduousness and sometimes also the ambiguity of a passage in which Kant attempts to establish a new basis for the validity of the principle of causality.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Per una rilettura kantiana del principio di causalità.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Descrizione: Pdf dell'articolo
Dimensione
1.19 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.19 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.