To compare overall (OS), cancer-specific (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and postoperative renal function amongst patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) of the distal (lower lumbar and pelvic) ureter, electively treated with segmental resection and termino-terminal anastomosis (TT) vs bladder cuff removal and ureteric re-implantation (RR).
Abrate, A., Sessa, F., Sebastianelli, A., Preto, M., Olivero, A., Varca, V., et al. (2019). Segmental resection of distal ureter with termino-terminal ureteric anastomosis vs bladder cuff removal and ureteric re-implantation for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results of a multicentre study. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 124(1), 1-8 [10.1111/bju.14697].
Segmental resection of distal ureter with termino-terminal ureteric anastomosis vs bladder cuff removal and ureteric re-implantation for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results of a multicentre study
Abrate, AlbertoWriting – Original Draft Preparation
;Pavone, CarloMembro del Collaboration Group
;Serretta, VincenzoMembro del Collaboration Group
;Vella, MarcoMembro del Collaboration Group
;Simonato, Alchiede
Conceptualization
2019-07-01
Abstract
To compare overall (OS), cancer-specific (CSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and postoperative renal function amongst patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) of the distal (lower lumbar and pelvic) ureter, electively treated with segmental resection and termino-terminal anastomosis (TT) vs bladder cuff removal and ureteric re-implantation (RR).
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Abrate_et_al-2019-BJU_International.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: articolo completo
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
411.69 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
411.69 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
