Nowadays, uterine fibroids can be treated using Magnetic Resonance guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS), which is a non-invasive therapy exploiting thermal ablation. In order to measure the Non-Perfused Volume (NPV) for treatment response assessment, the ablated fibroid areas (i.e., Region of Treatment, ROT) are manually contoured by a radiologist. The current operator-dependent methodology could affect the subsequent follow-up phases, due to the lack of result repeatability. In addition, this fully manual procedure is time-consuming, considerably increasing execution times. These critical issues can be addressed only by means of accurate and efficient automated Pattern Recognition approaches. In this contribution, we evaluate two computer-assisted segmentation methods, which we have already developed and validated, for uterine fibroid segmentation in MRgFUS treatments. A quantitative comparison on segmentation accuracy, in terms of area-based and distance-based metrics, was performed. The clinical feasibility of these approaches was assessed from physicians’ perspective, by proposing an integrated solution.

Rundo, L., Militello, C., Tangherloni, A., Russo, G., Lagalla, R., Mauri, G., et al. (2019). Computer-assisted approaches for uterine fibroid segmentation in MRgFUS treatments: Quantitative evaluation and clinical feasibility analysis. In A. Esposito, M. Faundez-Zanuy, F. Morabito (a cura di), Quantifying and Processing Biomedical and Behavioral Signals (pp. 229-241). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH [10.1007/978-3-319-95095-2_22].

Computer-assisted approaches for uterine fibroid segmentation in MRgFUS treatments: Quantitative evaluation and clinical feasibility analysis

Lagalla, Roberto;Vitabile, Salvatore
2019-01-01

Abstract

Nowadays, uterine fibroids can be treated using Magnetic Resonance guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS), which is a non-invasive therapy exploiting thermal ablation. In order to measure the Non-Perfused Volume (NPV) for treatment response assessment, the ablated fibroid areas (i.e., Region of Treatment, ROT) are manually contoured by a radiologist. The current operator-dependent methodology could affect the subsequent follow-up phases, due to the lack of result repeatability. In addition, this fully manual procedure is time-consuming, considerably increasing execution times. These critical issues can be addressed only by means of accurate and efficient automated Pattern Recognition approaches. In this contribution, we evaluate two computer-assisted segmentation methods, which we have already developed and validated, for uterine fibroid segmentation in MRgFUS treatments. A quantitative comparison on segmentation accuracy, in terms of area-based and distance-based metrics, was performed. The clinical feasibility of these approaches was assessed from physicians’ perspective, by proposing an integrated solution.
2019
Rundo, L., Militello, C., Tangherloni, A., Russo, G., Lagalla, R., Mauri, G., et al. (2019). Computer-assisted approaches for uterine fibroid segmentation in MRgFUS treatments: Quantitative evaluation and clinical feasibility analysis. In A. Esposito, M. Faundez-Zanuy, F. Morabito (a cura di), Quantifying and Processing Biomedical and Behavioral Signals (pp. 229-241). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH [10.1007/978-3-319-95095-2_22].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
MRgFUS_UterineFibroids_Evaluation&Feasibility-WIRN2017.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: paper
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale
Dimensione 400.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
400.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
2019_BookMatter_QuantifyingAndProcessingBiomed_ToC.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Descrizione: Table of Contents
Tipologia: Altro materiale (es. dati della ricerca)
Dimensione 123.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
123.61 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/336154
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact