Editor's note: Selecting the right platform for an embedded system is a challenging task, because there are no systematic methodologies for comprehensive evaluation and comparison of competing alternatives. This article partially addresses this problem by formulating a set of relevant metrics and an evaluation methodology. By applying their concepts to the evaluation of two alternative platforms, the Raspberry Pi3 and the Intel Edison boards, the authors demonstrate the utility of their approach and show under which objectives one is preferable over the other. - Axel Jantsch, TU Wien.

Alongi, A., Vitello, G., Vitabile, S., Conti, V. (2018). An Empirical Set of Metrics for Embedded Systems Testing. IEEE DESIGN & TEST, 35(5), 45-53 [10.1109/MDAT.2017.2787678].

An Empirical Set of Metrics for Embedded Systems Testing

Alongi, Alfonso;Vitello, Giuseppe;Vitabile, Salvatore;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Editor's note: Selecting the right platform for an embedded system is a challenging task, because there are no systematic methodologies for comprehensive evaluation and comparison of competing alternatives. This article partially addresses this problem by formulating a set of relevant metrics and an evaluation methodology. By applying their concepts to the evaluation of two alternative platforms, the Raspberry Pi3 and the Intel Edison boards, the authors demonstrate the utility of their approach and show under which objectives one is preferable over the other. - Axel Jantsch, TU Wien.
2018
Alongi, A., Vitello, G., Vitabile, S., Conti, V. (2018). An Empirical Set of Metrics for Embedded Systems Testing. IEEE DESIGN & TEST, 35(5), 45-53 [10.1109/MDAT.2017.2787678].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
08240747.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Dimensione 615.81 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
615.81 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/336152
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact