The paper aims to examine the very meaning of beneficentia in ancient Rome in relation to the reassessment of the role of the inopes as recipients of the different forms of liberalitas within the representation provided by Cicero in De officiis and Seneca in De beneficiis, without neglecting the contribution provided by Aristotle to the philosophical debate at issue. If Cicero claims the utility of the gifts to the poor (as long as they deserve them), highlighting that they involve a return not only in terms of gratitude but also in terms of glory (Off. 2, 63; 69-71), Seneca uses the account of Aeschines (Ben. 1, 8-9) in order to show the way through which the pauper, even without means, can find in himself the most appropriate resources to repay the donor in a virtuous manner. Seneca goes further by reporting the tale of Arcesilaus’ anonymous gift to the pauper verecundus (Ben. 2, 10, 1), by which he points out that the very donor’s gain doesn’t concern the gratitude of the beneficiary neither any reputational benefit, but the knowledge that he’s done some good.
L’articolo si propone di esaminare il significato specifico della beneficentia a Roma antica in rapporto alla rivalutazione del ruolo degli inopes come destinatari delle forme di liberalitas all’interno della rappresentazione fornita da Cicerone nel De officiis e da Seneca nel De beneficiis. Se Cicerone rivendica l’utilità del dono ai poveri (purché meritevoli) evidenziando come esso comporti un ritorno non solo in termini di riconoscenza ma anche di gloria (Off. 2, 63; 69-71), Seneca si serve dell’apologo di Eschine (Ben. 1, 8-9) per dimostrare come il pauper, benché privo di mezzi, possa trovare in se stesso le risorse più adeguate al contraccambio virtuoso. Seneca fa un passo ulteriore trattando del ‘dono anonimo’ di Arcesilao al pauper verecundus (Ben. 2, 10, 1), attraverso il quale segnala come il vero guadagno del donatore non consista nella riconoscenza del beneficato né in un ritorno di immagine, ma nella consapevolezza di aver fatto del bene.
L. Scolari (2018). Pauperem praeferam: Beneficentia e dono ai poveri tra Cicerone e Seneca. BOLLETTINO DI STUDI LATINI, 48(2), 550-568.
Pauperem praeferam: Beneficentia e dono ai poveri tra Cicerone e Seneca
L. Scolari
2018-01-01
Abstract
The paper aims to examine the very meaning of beneficentia in ancient Rome in relation to the reassessment of the role of the inopes as recipients of the different forms of liberalitas within the representation provided by Cicero in De officiis and Seneca in De beneficiis, without neglecting the contribution provided by Aristotle to the philosophical debate at issue. If Cicero claims the utility of the gifts to the poor (as long as they deserve them), highlighting that they involve a return not only in terms of gratitude but also in terms of glory (Off. 2, 63; 69-71), Seneca uses the account of Aeschines (Ben. 1, 8-9) in order to show the way through which the pauper, even without means, can find in himself the most appropriate resources to repay the donor in a virtuous manner. Seneca goes further by reporting the tale of Arcesilaus’ anonymous gift to the pauper verecundus (Ben. 2, 10, 1), by which he points out that the very donor’s gain doesn’t concern the gratitude of the beneficiary neither any reputational benefit, but the knowledge that he’s done some good.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
3. Scolari_Pauperem praeferam_nd_BSL_II_18.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Descrizione: Articolo
Dimensione
421.02 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
421.02 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.