Background Topical application of clobetasol-17-propionate has been diffusely reported as an efficacious therapy in atrophic ⁄ erosive oral lichen planus (OLP), without exposing the patient to systemic side-effects. However, prolonged contact and respective topical effects on the oral mucosa should be avoided. Objectives The aim of the present study was to evaluate efficacy and compliance of new lipid microspheres loaded with 0Æ025% of clobetasol propionate (formulation A) compared with a commonly used formulation (a sort of dispersion of a lipophilic ointment in a hydrophilic phase) with the same amount of drug (formulation B) in the topical treatment of OLP. Patients and methods Fifty patients with symptomatic OLP were enrolled in a controlled single- blind phase IV clinical trial. After a dropout of five patients, a total of 45 patients [12 males and 33 females; mean age 61Æ1 years (± 12Æ3 SD; range 25–82)] were treated (17 with formulation A and 28 with formulation B, matched for gender and age; P > 0Æ2) with the same dosage regimen. At times T0, T1 and T2 we evaluated the following parameters: (i) pain score (by linear visual analogue scale; 0–100); (ii) clinical score; (iii) clinical resolution; and (iv) patient compliance. Statistical analysis was calculated using S-Plus 4.0 and SPSS 9.0 (Student’s t-test, v 2 , Kolmogorov– Smirnow, Friedman, Student–Newman–Keuls, Mann–Whitney U-test and Spearman tests). Results Both formulations were found to be similar for parameters ii, iii and iv, although with a better general trend for formulation A; a significant difference was registered for formulation A in terms of a reduction in painful symptoms (parameter i) at time T2 (P ¼ 0Æ02). Conclusions Our results suggest that the new topical drug delivery system (formulation A) may enhance, at least in terms of symptom remission and compliance, the effectiveness of clobetasol propionate at a dose of 0Æ025% in OLP therapy.

Campisi, G., Giandalia, G., De Caro, V., Di Liberto, C., Aricò, P.'., Giannola, L.I. (2004). A new delivery system of Clobetasol-17-propionate (lipid loaded microspheres 0.025%) compared with a conventional formulation (lipophilic ointment in a hydrophilic phase 0.025%) in topical treatment of atrophic-erosive oral lichen planus. A Phase IV, randomized, observer-blinded, parallel group clinical trial,. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 150, 984-990 [10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05943.x].

A new delivery system of Clobetasol-17-propionate (lipid loaded microspheres 0.025%) compared with a conventional formulation (lipophilic ointment in a hydrophilic phase 0.025%) in topical treatment of atrophic-erosive oral lichen planus. A Phase IV, randomized, observer-blinded, parallel group clinical trial,

CAMPISI, Giuseppina;GIANDALIA, Giulia;DE CARO, Viviana;GIANNOLA, Libero Italo
2004-01-01

Abstract

Background Topical application of clobetasol-17-propionate has been diffusely reported as an efficacious therapy in atrophic ⁄ erosive oral lichen planus (OLP), without exposing the patient to systemic side-effects. However, prolonged contact and respective topical effects on the oral mucosa should be avoided. Objectives The aim of the present study was to evaluate efficacy and compliance of new lipid microspheres loaded with 0Æ025% of clobetasol propionate (formulation A) compared with a commonly used formulation (a sort of dispersion of a lipophilic ointment in a hydrophilic phase) with the same amount of drug (formulation B) in the topical treatment of OLP. Patients and methods Fifty patients with symptomatic OLP were enrolled in a controlled single- blind phase IV clinical trial. After a dropout of five patients, a total of 45 patients [12 males and 33 females; mean age 61Æ1 years (± 12Æ3 SD; range 25–82)] were treated (17 with formulation A and 28 with formulation B, matched for gender and age; P > 0Æ2) with the same dosage regimen. At times T0, T1 and T2 we evaluated the following parameters: (i) pain score (by linear visual analogue scale; 0–100); (ii) clinical score; (iii) clinical resolution; and (iv) patient compliance. Statistical analysis was calculated using S-Plus 4.0 and SPSS 9.0 (Student’s t-test, v 2 , Kolmogorov– Smirnow, Friedman, Student–Newman–Keuls, Mann–Whitney U-test and Spearman tests). Results Both formulations were found to be similar for parameters ii, iii and iv, although with a better general trend for formulation A; a significant difference was registered for formulation A in terms of a reduction in painful symptoms (parameter i) at time T2 (P ¼ 0Æ02). Conclusions Our results suggest that the new topical drug delivery system (formulation A) may enhance, at least in terms of symptom remission and compliance, the effectiveness of clobetasol propionate at a dose of 0Æ025% in OLP therapy.
2004
Campisi, G., Giandalia, G., De Caro, V., Di Liberto, C., Aricò, P.'., Giannola, L.I. (2004). A new delivery system of Clobetasol-17-propionate (lipid loaded microspheres 0.025%) compared with a conventional formulation (lipophilic ointment in a hydrophilic phase 0.025%) in topical treatment of atrophic-erosive oral lichen planus. A Phase IV, randomized, observer-blinded, parallel group clinical trial,. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 150, 984-990 [10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05943.x].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
17-A new delivery system of clobetasol-17-propionate.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Dimensione 159.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
159.65 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/30486
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 57
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
social impact