Multinaturalism shouldn’t be viewed solely as the paradigmatic existence of multiple natures in different cultures – or “ontologies” as Descola refers to them – but also and most importantly as the syntagmatic presence, and the resulting contrast, of various ontologies within the same culture. From a semiotic point of view, then, the so-called ontologies are considered to be effects of meaning derived from precise discursive dispositifs. Describing such dispositifs is the aim of this paper.
MArrone giovanni (2018). Bestiality: Animal Cultures. In G. Marrone, D. Mangano (a cura di), Semiotics of Animals in Culture (pp. 121-134). Cham : Springer [10.1007/978-3-319-72992-3_9].
Bestiality: Animal Cultures
MArrone giovanni
2018-01-01
Abstract
Multinaturalism shouldn’t be viewed solely as the paradigmatic existence of multiple natures in different cultures – or “ontologies” as Descola refers to them – but also and most importantly as the syntagmatic presence, and the resulting contrast, of various ontologies within the same culture. From a semiotic point of view, then, the so-called ontologies are considered to be effects of meaning derived from precise discursive dispositifs. Describing such dispositifs is the aim of this paper.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2018_marrone_BESTIALITY.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
340.51 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
340.51 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
