The paper aims to revise the traditional opinion, based on D. 9.4.21.1 (Ulp. 23 ad ed.), that in the noxal proceeding a non dominus could never defend a slave absent in iure. According to the author no technical reason justifies this opinion and D. 9.4.39.1 (Iul. 9 dig.) contradicts it. Therefore D. 9.4.21.1 should be interpreted in a differet way: a non dominus could defend a slave absent in iure by giving a positive answer to the interrogatio ‘an servus in potestate eius sit’; otherwise he would have to produce the slave in court, if in possession of him, in order to allow the claimant the ductio.
D'Angelo, G. (2017). Sulla difesa del servo assente da parte del terzo nel processo nossale classico. A proposito di D. 9.4.21.1 (Ulp. 23 ad ed.). ANNALI DEL SEMINARIO GIURIDICO, 60, 301-316.
Sulla difesa del servo assente da parte del terzo nel processo nossale classico. A proposito di D. 9.4.21.1 (Ulp. 23 ad ed.)
D'Angelo, G
2017-01-01
Abstract
The paper aims to revise the traditional opinion, based on D. 9.4.21.1 (Ulp. 23 ad ed.), that in the noxal proceeding a non dominus could never defend a slave absent in iure. According to the author no technical reason justifies this opinion and D. 9.4.39.1 (Iul. 9 dig.) contradicts it. Therefore D. 9.4.21.1 should be interpreted in a differet way: a non dominus could defend a slave absent in iure by giving a positive answer to the interrogatio ‘an servus in potestate eius sit’; otherwise he would have to produce the slave in court, if in possession of him, in order to allow the claimant the ductio.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sulla difesa del servo assente.pdf
Solo gestori archvio
Dimensione
785.3 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
785.3 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
