SUMMARY: The adoption of proper constitutive laws for confined concrete is basic for seismic assessment of new and existing reinforced concrete civil structures. The deformation capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) columns subjected to axially centred and eccentric loads depends on the effectiveness confinement action. A proper assignment of the stressstrainlaws for concrete allows obtaining an adequate definition of the ductility of the crosssections and correctly identifying mechanical nonlinearities in computational models.Several studies concerning the behaviour of confined concrete have been carried out, highlighting the role of different geometrical and mechanical parameters to the overall response of RC members in compression. In this frame, the primary aim of this paper is to discuss the reliability of the stress-strain concrete models for concrete subjected to confining stresses in the cases of normal strength concrete (NSC), and high strength concrete (HSC). A selected review of the most popular models for confined concrete available in the literature is presented and discussed together with the respective analytical formulations. Furthermore, a discussion on their reliability is carried out by comparing results coming from the implementation of each model and comparing analytical predictions with experimental data available in the literature.

Cavaleri, L., Fabio Di, T., Ferrotto, M., Davì, L. (2017). Stress-strain models for normal and high strength confined concrete: Test and comparison of literature models reliability in reproducing experimental results. INGEGNERIA SISMICA, 34(3-4), 114-137.

Stress-strain models for normal and high strength confined concrete: Test and comparison of literature models reliability in reproducing experimental results

Cavaleri, Liborio;Trapani, Fabio Di;Ferrotto, Marco Filippo;
2017-01-01

Abstract

SUMMARY: The adoption of proper constitutive laws for confined concrete is basic for seismic assessment of new and existing reinforced concrete civil structures. The deformation capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) columns subjected to axially centred and eccentric loads depends on the effectiveness confinement action. A proper assignment of the stressstrainlaws for concrete allows obtaining an adequate definition of the ductility of the crosssections and correctly identifying mechanical nonlinearities in computational models.Several studies concerning the behaviour of confined concrete have been carried out, highlighting the role of different geometrical and mechanical parameters to the overall response of RC members in compression. In this frame, the primary aim of this paper is to discuss the reliability of the stress-strain concrete models for concrete subjected to confining stresses in the cases of normal strength concrete (NSC), and high strength concrete (HSC). A selected review of the most popular models for confined concrete available in the literature is presented and discussed together with the respective analytical formulations. Furthermore, a discussion on their reliability is carried out by comparing results coming from the implementation of each model and comparing analytical predictions with experimental data available in the literature.
2017
Cavaleri, L., Fabio Di, T., Ferrotto, M., Davì, L. (2017). Stress-strain models for normal and high strength confined concrete: Test and comparison of literature models reliability in reproducing experimental results. INGEGNERIA SISMICA, 34(3-4), 114-137.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Stress-strain models for normal and high strength confined concrete_ Test and comparison of literature models reliability in reproducing experimental results.pdf

Solo gestori archvio

Dimensione 2.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.51 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10447/252447
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact