In this paper, we aim to revive the research project on the spontaneous order by examining it critically. We aim to show that normative formulations of the spontaneous order suffer from one main flaw: they focus on the origin of orders rather than on how orders actually perform. In particular, we argue that such normative formulations tend to qualify orders as spontaneous according to two main requirements: unintendedness and negative liberty.
Cordasco, C.L., Bavetta, S. (2015). Spontaneous Order: Origins, Actual Spontaneity, Diversity. THE INDEPENDENT REVIEW, 20(1), 47-59.
Spontaneous Order: Origins, Actual Spontaneity, Diversity
BAVETTA, Sebastiano
2015-01-01
Abstract
In this paper, we aim to revive the research project on the spontaneous order by examining it critically. We aim to show that normative formulations of the spontaneous order suffer from one main flaw: they focus on the origin of orders rather than on how orders actually perform. In particular, we argue that such normative formulations tend to qualify orders as spontaneous according to two main requirements: unintendedness and negative liberty.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CordBav_spontorder.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale
Dimensione
625.07 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
625.07 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.