The present paper deals with the decision of the Italian Constitutional Court to refer a preliminary ruling to the European Court of Justice on the well-known case "Taricco". The latter, in 2015, stated that the Italian law on statute of limitations was inconsistent with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, having regard to the obligation upon Member States, stemming from art. 325 TFUE. The Constitutional Court found that such an interpretation of the afore mentioned norm could bring to a violation of the rule of law in criminal matters, with particular regard to the prohibition of retroactive application of criminal law "in peius", intended as a fundamental principle of the constitutional order. Such an inconsistency, if the ECJ [European Court of Justice] will not solve it through a different interpretation of art. 325, will bring to the unconstitutionality of the law of execution of the TFUE
terrasi alfredo (2017). Note a margine dell’ordinanza della Corte costituzionale sul caso Taricco: l’effetto delle norme dei trattati istitutivi dell’UE sulla legge penale sostanziale italiana. DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE(1), 308-315.
Data di pubblicazione: | 2017 |
Titolo: | Note a margine dell’ordinanza della Corte costituzionale sul caso Taricco: l’effetto delle norme dei trattati istitutivi dell’UE sulla legge penale sostanziale italiana |
Autori: | |
Citazione: | terrasi alfredo (2017). Note a margine dell’ordinanza della Corte costituzionale sul caso Taricco: l’effetto delle norme dei trattati istitutivi dell’UE sulla legge penale sostanziale italiana. DIRITTI UMANI E DIRITTO INTERNAZIONALE(1), 308-315. |
Rivista: | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.12829/86217 |
Abstract: | The present paper deals with the decision of the Italian Constitutional Court to refer a preliminary ruling to the European Court of Justice on the well-known case "Taricco". The latter, in 2015, stated that the Italian law on statute of limitations was inconsistent with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, having regard to the obligation upon Member States, stemming from art. 325 TFUE. The Constitutional Court found that such an interpretation of the afore mentioned norm could bring to a violation of the rule of law in criminal matters, with particular regard to the prohibition of retroactive application of criminal law "in peius", intended as a fundamental principle of the constitutional order. Such an inconsistency, if the ECJ [European Court of Justice] will not solve it through a different interpretation of art. 325, will bring to the unconstitutionality of the law of execution of the TFUE |
URL: | https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.12829/86217 |
Settore Scientifico Disciplinare: | Settore IUS/13 - Diritto Internazionale |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.01 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Terrasi, Note a margine dell'ordinanza.pdf | Articolo principale | Versione Editoriale | Administrator Richiedi una copia |