The article analyses the content of three referring orders (from Court of Messina, Torino and Perugia) challenging the new electoral statute approved by Italian Parliament (l. n. 52/2015). The analysis is carried out against the background of the most recent case law of the Italian Constitutional Court. In the judgment n. 1/2014, indeed, the Court tried to shed a light on the notions of “freedom” and “personality” of the voting right in a really innovative way. The Author specially focuses on controversial profiles stemming from the new orders, paying special attention to the “majority bonus” and to the run-off second ballot, as well as to the system of “partially blocked lists”.
Armanno, M. (2016). Ancora su premio di maggioranza, liste bloccate e candidature plurime. Note alle nuove ordinanze di rinvio dell’Italicum. OSSERVATORIO SULLE FONTI.
Ancora su premio di maggioranza, liste bloccate e candidature plurime. Note alle nuove ordinanze di rinvio dell’Italicum
ARMANNO, Marco
2016-01-01
Abstract
The article analyses the content of three referring orders (from Court of Messina, Torino and Perugia) challenging the new electoral statute approved by Italian Parliament (l. n. 52/2015). The analysis is carried out against the background of the most recent case law of the Italian Constitutional Court. In the judgment n. 1/2014, indeed, the Court tried to shed a light on the notions of “freedom” and “personality” of the voting right in a really innovative way. The Author specially focuses on controversial profiles stemming from the new orders, paying special attention to the “majority bonus” and to the run-off second ballot, as well as to the system of “partially blocked lists”.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
OSF_3_2016 Armanno.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
265.49 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
265.49 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.